Re: Terminal Server - Opteron vs Xeon, multi core vs processor speed.
- From: "Jeff Pitsch" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:33:13 -0500
How do you know each session is taking 65mb? with the shared memory
architecture of terminal services, it's difficult to determine how much
memory each session actually uses.
Jeff Pitsch
http://www.sbcgatekeeper.com
Your Terminal Services Security Website
"R.Hozee" <r.hozee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134398671.798565.238850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Patrick,
> thank you for the feedback. I had the 64bit story already in mind, but
> we have to work with 32bit custum made applications that wont be ported
> to 64bit soon. If I understand it correctly your pointing to the 4GB
> 'limit' as the cap for terminal servers? I just checked the average
> memory usage per user, which floats around 65 MB per user. 4GB/65MB
> makes ~60 users max for me, what would still be decent compared to our
> current cap of 30 users per server.
>
> The question of Opteron terminal server performance remains, so if
> anyone has experience with Opterons your welcome to post:)
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Printing on a Lexmark X5250
- Next by Date: Re: SBS 2003 / Virual Server / Terminal Server
- Previous by thread: Re: Terminal Server - Opteron vs Xeon, multi core vs processor speed.
- Next by thread: Re: Terminal Server - Opteron vs Xeon, multi core vs processor speed.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|