Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- From: "Jeff Pitsch" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:52:16 -0500
Sorry, I should have specified. SQL probably does not have to be
reinstalled. I can't imagine it has any per user settings that need to be
copied. It comes down to this, any application that has per user settings
needs to be reinstalled.
You will want to check the resource usage of the server before installing
TS. If that server is heavily used, then adding TS may very well wreck
performance. as well, when you install TS it will require users being
logged off because it will minimally require a reboot. when you are
installing applications as well you do not want users logged into the box
even through SQL.
Jeff Pitsch
http://www.sbcgatekeeper.com
Your Terminal Services Security Website
"Giles Keen" <GilesKeen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ED5E635B-39E6-4BF0-98C0-F6EAF2CA2A5F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks for your email.
>
> I am a little confused.
>
> The client only has 2 servers :
>
> SBS 2003 Server - Active Directory, Exchange, DNS
> W2K3 Server - SQL Server + A Few Apps
>
> I have read advice that Terminal Services should not be installed on a
> Domain Server and therefore I agree that the only option is to install TS
> on
> the W2K3 Server
> but I am very worried about having to reinstall SQL etc...
>
> I understand per your advice that it is a bad idea to load TS on the same
> server as SQL but I dont think I have any other option. Is it just the
> applications that would need to be reinstalled (which is no big deal) OR
> SQL
> Server would have to be completely uninstalled too ?
>
> The client is using SQL heavily i.e. 30 users logged in and if I have to
> uninstall and reinstall SQL then I will have to get all users logged out
> of
> SQL for however long which may require me to reschedule my visit until a
> more
> convenient time for the client to have all users sitting around doing
> nothing.
>
> Hope this makes sense. Sorry if I have repeated myself or not understood
> your reply correctly.
>
> Many Thanks in advnace for your time.
>
> Giles
>
>
>
> "Jeff Pitsch" wrote:
>
>> See inline
>> "Giles Keen" <GilesKeen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:88698450-416C-4141-AF7D-F27B7B0FB736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I have a couple of silly questions which someone will probably answer
>> > easily........
>> >
>> > I am going out to a clients on Friday to install and setup Terminal
>> > Services
>> > on a Windows 2003 Server which has SQL Installed.
>> >
>> > The Server in question is NOT a domain controller and does not have
>> > Active
>> > Directory installed.
>> >
>> > The client has another server (SBS 2003) which has Active Directory,
>> > DNS,
>> > Exchange running on it.
>> >
>> > My questions are :
>> >
>> > 1) Can I install TS and the TS Licence Server on the Windows 2003
>> > Server
>> > which does not have Active Directory ? This is what I would like to
>> > do.
>>
>> yes that is the preferred way. Put TS on a member server.
>>
>> >
>> > 2) When I try to install TS on the Windows 2003 Server it warns me that
>> > there will be a problem with all programs already installed and they
>> > will
>> > not
>> > work correctly. Does this include SQL Server ? Will SQL Server stop
>> > working
>> > and have to be reinstalled ?
>>
>> Yes, you do NOT want to install TS on a SQL server. Both are resource
>> and
>> memory intensive applications. You will get a very very limited number
>> of
>> users (yes I know only four but I will guarantee you it will grow and
>> then
>> everyone will be unhappy) on the server and performance will suffer for
>> both. Really bad idea. You will also have to reinstall all applications
>> when you put TS on the server. The shadow key needs to be populated
>> properly.
>>
>> >
>> > There will only be 4 users (max) using the Terminal Server and
>> > therefore
>> > the
>> > demand will be very low. The Windows 2003 Server is dual processor and
>> > 4GB
>> > Memory.
>> >
>> > I have all the TS CALS Purchased and just want to have a successful
>> > install
>> > on Friday.
>> >
>> > Many Thanks for any advice
>> >
>> > Giles
>> >
>>
>>
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- From: Giles Keen
- Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- References:
- Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- From: Giles Keen
- Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- Prev by Date: Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- Next by Date: Re: Terminal server manager not releasing ID's
- Previous by thread: Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- Next by thread: Re: Deployment - Active Directory and SQL Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|