Re: Load weight - for 4 Server
- From: "Cesar Camargos" <cesar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:02:33 -0200
Thanks Patrick!
"Patrick Rouse" <PatrickRouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5D2ED474-537F-42A9-ACEF-3E70166E64BC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> If you were using an RDP load balancer you wouldn't have to worry about
> this
> because it would determine this for you based on the session count, CPU %,
> available memory, context switches...
>
> There's a list of available load balancers here that range from free, to
> under $1000, to full-featured management suites that include load
> balancing:
>
> http://www.sessioncomputing.com/add-on.htm
> --
> Patrick Rouse
> Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
> http://www.sessioncomputing.com
>
>
> "Cesar Camargos" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have 4 Terminal Servers in NLB:
>> 2 Servers - Dell 2600 Duall Xeon 4GB ram
>> 1 Server - Dell 2600 Duall Xeon 1,5GB Ram
>> 1 Server - IBM Dual PIII 4GB ram
>>
>> What's the best configuration "load weight" for this environment?
>> Anyone have a good link about this topic?
>>
>>
>> tanks
>> Cesar Camargos
>>
>>
>>
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Load weight - for 4 Server
- From: ponga
- Re: Load weight - for 4 Server
- References:
- Load weight - for 4 Server
- From: Cesar Camargos
- Load weight - for 4 Server
- Prev by Date: Re: temp.domain Profiles being created
- Next by Date: Re: Using Terminal Server 2003 and Port Redirection
- Previous by thread: Load weight - for 4 Server
- Next by thread: Re: Load weight - for 4 Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
