RE: Reserving Memory for TS or setting Priority?
- From: "Patrick Rouse" <PatrickRouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:11:06 -0700
Prioity & Affinity only pertain to CPU usage, not memory allocation.
Can you elaborate, i.e. Server Version, Number of Sessions, amount of
Installed Memory, amount used... If you've exhaused the paged pool, or
reached the maximum registry size (Win2K only) you will not be able to add
new sessions and the system will become unstable.
The Terminal Services Service does NOT use a lot of memory, i.e. a couple of
MB per session. The applications users run are what consume the majority of
the available user memory. Remember that the maximum amount of user memory
available is 1/2 of the installed memory, as the other 1/2 is dedicated to
system processes.
Patrick Rouse
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
http://www.workthin.com
"IINET" wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know if it is possible to set the TS service a higher
> priority
> than others... or set aside memory that can only be used for TS. Here is
> the problem, if I
> open one to many things TS will not work because it will not have enough
> memory to open a
> new connection. I was just wondering if it was possible to set aside some
> memory for the
> TS process so that I will never be locked out of TS simply because the
> system is already using
> the max amount of memory.
>
> Jimmy
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reserving Memory for TS or setting Priority?
- From: Jim Vierra
- Re: Reserving Memory for TS or setting Priority?
- References:
- Reserving Memory for TS or setting Priority?
- From: IINET
- Reserving Memory for TS or setting Priority?
- Prev by Date: RE: automatic printer mapping driver mismatch problem
- Next by Date: RE: Default Printer
- Previous by thread: Reserving Memory for TS or setting Priority?
- Next by thread: Re: Reserving Memory for TS or setting Priority?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
