Re: Terminal Services Security using Remote Desktop Client
From: Cláudio Rodrigues (Claudio.Rodrigues_at_NOSPAM-Terminal-Services.NET)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: venkatesh: "Re: Terminal server license issuance"
- Previous message: Mike Silverman: "Re: Temporary internet files"
- In reply to: Alex K. Angelopoulos [MVP]: "Re: Terminal Services Security using Remote Desktop Client"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:15:47 -0400
Add to that if your machine is not patched and more than that, infected with
something, as soon as you VPN and become a node of your corporate network
you may start infecting everything there.
As it is very hard as of today to control what your users have at their own
homes, VPNs may be a huge problem for many companies.
Using TS, this problem does not exist.
-- Cláudio Rodrigues Microsoft MVP Windows Technologies - Terminal Services http://www.terminal-services.net "Alex K. Angelopoulos [MVP]" <aka-at-mvps-dot-org> wrote in message news:ONjk9qIjEHA.2652@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > Cláudio Rodrigues wrote: >> Although there were some DoS available through the RDP protocol, after >> years of experience deploying TS, I am still to see one single case >> where a TS was hacked using the RDP protocol only. >> The RDP encryption is enough for sure and more than that is needed if >> your company is paranoic. >> A VPN is way a bigger, huge risk these days than a terminal server. > > Since I generally agree with Cláudio, I'm piggybacking on his post. :) > > I tend to prefer using VPN/SSH, but the reasons for that have nothing to > do with specifics of TS security; it's simply because those connections > allow me to tunnel in remotely and access many different points on a LAN, > with only one external configured connection. > > This brings us around to the reason why a VPN might be a security risk. > The single most significant vulnerability that is exploited is not someone > decrypting your traffic: it's brute force attacks succeeding against > poorly selected passwords. In that scenario, you can argue that a VPN is > LESS secure simply because the attacker would have direct access to > anything on your LAN accessible from the VPN. > >
- Next message: venkatesh: "Re: Terminal server license issuance"
- Previous message: Mike Silverman: "Re: Temporary internet files"
- In reply to: Alex K. Angelopoulos [MVP]: "Re: Terminal Services Security using Remote Desktop Client"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|