Re: Anonymous connections.
From: Skarlund (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 04/22/04
- Next message: Patrick Rouse [MVP]: "Re: 2003 Server + VNC"
- Previous message: Patrick Rouse [MVP]: "Re: Thin Client manufacturers, any recommendations?"
- In reply to: Benny Tritsch: "Re: Anonymous connections."
- Next in thread: Jack Wang [MSFT]: "Re: Anonymous connections."
- Reply: Jack Wang [MSFT]: "Re: Anonymous connections."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:51:58 -0700
Tanks,
By the way, can Windows 2003 Terminal Server coexist with
Windows 2000 Licensing Server, and vice versa?
Regards,
Jörgen
>-----Original Message-----
>If your individual users log in from different
locacations or different
>devices, you'll have to use the "Per User" licensing. In
the Microsoft
>world, this is a named user licensing model. Citrix
prefers the concurrent
>user licensing model. Sometimes these different
licencing models do not fit
>perfectly ;-)) You'll have to buy as many Microsoft TS
user licenses as you
>have potential TS users.
>
>Benny
>
>--
>Dr. Bernhard Tritsch
>Author of "Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Terminal
Services" by Microsoft
>Press
>Microsoft MVP Windows Server - Terminal Server
>Chief System Architect, visionapp GmbH, Germany
>
>
>"Skarlund" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message
>news:214601c4277b$a09b9cf0$a001280a@phx.gbl...
>Hi,
>
>The Citrix issue is not my problem, it's the Terminal
>Server.
>
>Citrix is working in following way with anonymous
>accounts; a license is required for every concurrent
>session. When the user logs off the license is released
>and another user can take the advantage of the license.
>
>With Windows I don't think this is working in the same
>way. My issue is that we will use anonymous accounts for
>terminal server sessions. Even if I only will use the
>functionality of Citrix Metaframe TS cal will be required
>for the sessions.
>Because the users (not more than 10 concurrent sessions)
>will use different devices I don't know which license
>mode to choose.
>
>If Windows 2003 have same functionality like Citrix, then
>my problems are solved.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jörgen
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Hi Jorgen,
>>
>>Thank you for the update. I don't have enough resource
>on the third-party
>>Citrix Metaframe XP program. The Terminal Services
>Configure is used for
>>the Terminal Services of Windows Server 2003. I suggest
>you contact Citrix
>>directly to find more information about the issue. For
>your convenience, I
>>have included the link.
>>
>>http://www.citrix.com/site/contact/index.asp
>>
>>Have a nice day!
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Jack Wang, MCSE 2000, MCSA, MCDBA, MCSD
>>Microsoft Partner Support
>>
>>Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>>
>>=====================================================
>>When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via
>>your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit
>>from your issue.
>>=====================================================
>>
>>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
>confers no rights.
>>--------------------
>>| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>>| From: "Skarlund" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>>| Sender: "Skarlund"
><anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>>| References: <1b3c01c426ec$11e0d0a0$a001280a@phx.gbl>
>><MWVSVK2JEHA.4016@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>
>>| Subject: RE: Anonymous connections.
>>| Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:09:24 -0700
>>| Lines: 69
>>| Message-ID: <1ea801c42767$32177790$a601280a@phx.gbl>
>>| MIME-Version: 1.0
>>| Content-Type: text/plain;
>>| charset="iso-8859-1"
>>| Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>>| thread-index: AcQnZzIV3DCGBjLtRC2kroBRK8XDaQ==
>>| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
>V5.50.4910.0300
>>| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services
>>| Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
>>| Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
>>microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:12669
>>| NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftngxa14.phx.gbl 10.40.1.166
>>| X-Tomcat-NG:
microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services
>>|
>>| Sorry,
>>| Will run Citrix Metaframe XP with anonymous accounts,
>>| which license mode is appropriate for me to choose on
>the
>>| Windows 2003 Terminal Server?
>>| Regards,
>>| Jörgen
>>| >-----Original Message-----
>>| >Hi
>>| >
>>| >Thank you for posting!
>>| >
>>| >From your message, I am not clear about the issue.
>Could
>>| you let me know
>>| >the detail information of the issue? Thank you for
>your
>>| time.
>>| >
>>| >Sincerely,
>>| >Jack Wang, MCSE 2000, MCSA, MCDBA, MCSD
>>| >Microsoft Partner Support
>>| >
>>| >Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>>| >
>>| >=====================================================
>>| >When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via
>>| >your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit
>>| >from your issue.
>>| >=====================================================
>>| >
>>| >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,
>and
>>| confers no rights.
>>| >--------------------
>>| >| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>>| >| From: "Skarlund" <joskr@ncmnordic.se>
>>| >| Sender: "Skarlund" <joskr@ncmnordic.se>
>>| >| Subject: Anonymous connections.
>>| >| Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:28:02 -0700
>>| >| Lines: 3
>>| >| Message-ID: <1b3c01c426ec$11e0d0a0
$a001280a@phx.gbl>
>>| >| MIME-Version: 1.0
>>| >| Content-Type: text/plain;
>>| >| charset="iso-8859-1"
>>| >| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>| >| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>>| >| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
>>| V5.50.4910.0300
>>| >| Thread-Index: AcQm7BHgRkGtGYRHTMGigwwOGqqtCw==
>>| >| Newsgroups:
>microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services
>>| >| Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
>>| >| Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
>>| >microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:12645
>>| >| NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftngxa08.phx.gbl
10.40.1.160
>>| >| X-Tomcat-NG:
>microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services
>>| >|
>>| >| Hi,
>>| >|
>>| >|
>>| >|
>>| >
>>| >.
>>| >
>>|
>>
>>.
>>
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: Patrick Rouse [MVP]: "Re: 2003 Server + VNC"
- Previous message: Patrick Rouse [MVP]: "Re: Thin Client manufacturers, any recommendations?"
- In reply to: Benny Tritsch: "Re: Anonymous connections."
- Next in thread: Jack Wang [MSFT]: "Re: Anonymous connections."
- Reply: Jack Wang [MSFT]: "Re: Anonymous connections."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|