Re: Running Virtual server on 2003 std vs Enterprise
- From: "kj [SBS MVP]" <KevinJ.SBS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:06:49 -0700
Jeff Viola wrote:
I'm going to run 4 virtual OS (2 windows 2003 std and 2 Redhat) on a
windows 2003 server. The server will have 12 gigs of RAM 2 Quad-core
processors. I was going to put standard on it, but just read that I
will need to use enterprise. Is that correct? Are there any
benefits to running the virtual on enterprise?
Thoughts?
Well if you can run the 64 bit edition of standard you can support up to
64GB of memory, otherwise 32bit standard only does 4GB.
--
/kj
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Running Virtual server on 2003 std vs Enterprise
- From: Danny Sanders
- Re: Running Virtual server on 2003 std vs Enterprise
- Prev by Date: Re: Folder Redirection in 2003 GPO editor
- Next by Date: Re: Running Virtual server on 2003 std vs Enterprise
- Previous by thread: Re: Folder Redirection in 2003 GPO editor
- Next by thread: Re: Running Virtual server on 2003 std vs Enterprise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|