Re: GB Switch Connection



Terri-

You created a bridging loop by activating that second line. You need to get
switches which support spanning tree protocol. You're not going to get load
balancing the wya you have it setup with stp either

A gige link should be more htan enough for 60 clients hitting a file server.
You'd need something that supports ethercahnnel to make a 2gig channel
between your 10/100 switches and the sw16.



--
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
Windows Server MVP

www.briandesmond.com


"Terri S" <Theresa.schwamberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23sqbQQL1FHA.2132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I had two CAT6 cables installed between two rooms, each room I have a
> All-GB-port switch (unmanaged, shown on the drawing, one 16 port and one 8
> ports)
>
> in closet B is where we have the SAN and are planning on putting most of
> our
> servers, I decided to build a GB backbone before all this happen, I
> already
> had about 60-70 ports of workstations occupied in room B (SW24-ABC), in
> which they are on 10/100 ports (all unmanaged switches as well) with two
> GB
> uplink port (on the drawing I showed the way I chained them) so they can
> all
> talk to room A (from SW24-ABC to SW8) where all the servers were at that
> time
>
> We have some servers now connected to SW16, including the SAN file server
> which everybody is going to hit once we open the door to the SAN storage,
> the cable marked " 1 " is the cable it rely on to talk to the rest of the
> network (room A has about 60-70 percent of workstations and half of the
> servers still there), that means (correct me if I am wrong) before people
> can get to the SAN, it has to go through Switch ABC (SW24-ABC s on the
> drawing), the GB connection has to be divided by the switch chains,
>
> With that in mind, I activated the other original CAT6 run (which runs
> between the rooms, marked "2" on the drawing") by connecting switches SW16
> and SW8 in hope that people can get faster access to the SAN and the
> servers
> on SW16, but I immediately get people's calls that network is not working
> (especially the email and the internet) and it back to work if I
> disconnect
> the cable marked "2"
>
> so does means this setting does not allow 2 uplink cables on SW16 ? should
> I
> have disconnect 1 before connect 2 ?
>
> note that I put down on the drawing that the SW8 also goes to other 10/100
> switches in room A, which majority of user there complained about the down
> connection, I also have all the users complain about email not work
> because
> the exchange server is connected to the SW16, I didn't have time to check
> around but I believe the outage was across the broad as soon as I
> connected
> cable 2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How does authentication work?
    ... I can only guess as to the authentication. ... I have no idea how the SAN shares are setup and do ... The connection does not drop every day and it is hard to tell when it occurs ... Our application server has 10 drive mappings. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • RE: Storage server
    ... pretty firmly in the SAN neighborhood. ... With a server, you are constricted by the speed and design of your network. ... This means if you don't have very good switches, the correct QoS, and low ... Whereas if we use a storage server, we can easiliy upgrade the system ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: gb issue
    ... but since you have unmanaged switches (or at ... connection unplugged, or unplug another link. ... > servers, I decided to build a GB backbone before all this happen, I ... > We have some servers now connected to SW16, including the SAN file server ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • dhcp giving wrong ip address
    ... LightPointe Laser fiber connection between two switches, ... one connnected to our server and one in a new warehouse ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Server 2003 mapped drive disconnects from SAN
    ... with SAN shared drives. ... The mapped drives periodically disconnect from the shares and cannot be ... I know that Server 2003 SP1+ no longer caches credentials when you map using ... I suspect that when the connection is first established and the credentials ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)