Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- From: "Jim" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:57:35 -0000
What's the difference between a 'user' and a 'computer'?
You only need to punch information into a computer once.
Nice one..:-)
This guy at my company was going on about opening port 80 and I didn't really like the sound of that, that's why I stuck with the CEICW and sought your views/recomendations.
He kept talking about Outlook over http...I kept saying to him " you'll be talking about 'rpc over https then' " ? he kept insisting that it was just over http..live and learn..
Jim.
"SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23g4oAO3oJHA.3984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
yes, I'll also state that the only 'proper' reason to allow port 80 in is the automatic redirection to HTTPS.
My _opinion_ is that if users are too lazy to remember httpS they should not be allowed to connect.
What's the difference between a 'user' and a 'computer'?
You only need to punch information into a computer once.
:-)
--
SBS remote support services. (Fees apply)
mickm at mickmalloy dot dyndns dot org
"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uz%23yZT2oJHA.6096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIIRC the SBS documentation recommends opening 80 so that incoming RWW connections to http://whatever can be automatically redirected to https://whatever. Many people, myself included, run RWW with port 80 closed by instructing the users to use https://. Regardless, you don't need to open port 80 for Outlook RPC, as you're configuring that to use https anyway, and once configured, the user doesn't have to worry about the connection settings.
"SteveB" <newsgroup@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Oox4D91oJHA.1340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxJames I've seen several posts from you saying to open port 80. I think you should just recommend only port 443.
"James Yeomans BSc, MCSE, MCTS" <JamesYeomansBScMCSEMCTS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:0EC07432-2114-4E8F-A4AE-4A3A5CD7382D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxOutlook anywhere is basically the same as Outlook but you check an option
when mapping the exchange mailbox for the first time (to use RPC over HTTP
which must be installed on the server), its in the advanced options somewhere
and the mailbox must be mapped when on the internal network initially. You
need port 80 open for inbound connections on the firewall.
James.
--
James Yeomans, BSc, MCSE, MCTS
Ask me directly at: http://www.justaskjames.co.uk
"Jim" wrote:
Have a SBS 2003 with 20 laptop users.
In a nutshell what are the advantages or disadvantages of using an Outlook
Anywhere type connection as opposed to regular Outlook connected to Exchange
in the regular manner..
One of the guys is telling me that where he used to work everyone was
connected to Exchange without having to make a VPN connection like they
currently do at this place.
They share lots of items in each others mailboxes.
Can this still be undertaken if they were setup with Outlook Anywhere ?
Jim.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]
- Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- References:
- Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- From: Jim
- RE: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- From: James Yeomans BSc, MCSE, MCTS
- Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- From: SteveB
- Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- From: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]
- Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]
- Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- Prev by Date: Re: Big problem with Vista clients
- Next by Date: RWW 2008 issue with Vista machines
- Previous by thread: Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- Next by thread: Re: Outlook Vs Outlook Anywhere
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading