Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- From: "Al Williams" <donotreplydirect@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:23:23 -0700
OK, got it on the server & exchange no problem.
Installed it manually on the first client and it runs, but I can't get it to
update via the SBS server.
Licensing is OK (I imported the licence.xml file) but it's having issues
getting through ISA for updates. First, it looks like I need the firewall
client to get updates (I don't install it by default as most just need web
access and IE handles that on its own). Even after installing the firewall
client I tried opening port 42511 but the ISA logs show it going through but
for some reason a RST occurs during the packet. Not sure if I need to
configure the proxy in CA - even if I do the authentication options don't
appear to work right.
For now, I opened up ISA to allow direct updates from the CA site for all
clients but I'd like to get it working use the "redistribution server" from
the SBS.
How did you set up updates for the clients?
Still not clear on the phone home thing for the clients, did you need to add
each client to the organization in the CA console discovery tab or what?
Thx
--
Allan Williams
"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eU%237L8VXJHA.868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1. I had a bad experience trying to install this from a download when we
got the first Vista box a year or so ago, and had to reinstall it from the
CD. Since then, I've done all the rest from the CD. Either way, the
updating thing does seem to make it less relevant as long as you get some
version of 8.1. It'll be current after the first download either way.
2. I want to touch each PC anyway, to make sure the licensing is
configured properly. So, I have not tried the remote install. I'm just
doing them individually as time allows, since all the XP boxes are doing
fine with version 7. When I renewed the license last, I had one Vista
desktop that failed to pick up the renewal and stopped updating, so I want
to see that none of the desktops are showing the trial license.
3. You do need a contract to get signatures now - as far as I know, it's
the regular CA thing that includes support, software updates, etc. If I
remember right, it costs in the neighborhood of $12 per seat per year,
including the server and Exchange. If you don't have a CA open license
vendor, try SoftwareONE. I get my MS open licenses from them too -
they're great.
4. I've done all in-place upgrades. I did the console first (the 8
console works with 7, but the 7 console does not work with 8). Once the
console was done, I did the Vista boxes as I deployed them (7 doesn't work
on Vista). Now I've been doing the XP boxes one or two at a time until I
get them all upgraded. In-place upgrade retains your existing settings
(if you choose the option). However, for settings that don't exist in 7,
they'll be at the defaults. That means in particular, the "phone home"
feature will not be configured. That's what gets you the licensing from
the SBS, so you need to make sure that's done. You can control that
setting from the console, but if you do that without verifying that the
setting applied correctly, you'll need to monitor that the desktops don't
fail to update after the expiration of the trial license.
5. Have not tried it on a TS, but I can't see any reason it wouldn't work
as expected.
"Al Williams" <donotreplydirect@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OZ7HV0KXJHA.5272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A few Q's:
1) Did you use the v8.1 CD or did you get updates from the web? With 7.1
my CD was so old it needed upteen patches but I don't see any updates for
v8.1 up on CA's site (unless I'm looking int he wrong place). Maybe with
this new update system you mention updates are obsolete...
2) Were you able to remotely upgrade the client PC's as well? I used
their remote install in 7.1 and it worked OK (other than not going
through the Windows XP firewall) and was wondering if v8.1 worked
similarly.
3) So they changed it so you need a contract to get signatures? Oh well,
it was cheap while it lasted.
4) Did you uninstall the 7.1 exchange part before upgrading or does it
maintain your exclusions etc. if you install over top? I see CA doc
TEC432016 documents a bug if you install over-top but wasn't sure if it
applies.
5) Do you know of any issues running it on a terminal server?
Thanks.
--
Allan Williams
"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:%23ug$yeKXJHA.1184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I can't really say that Apache has caused me any problems. It runs two
services, and eTrust runs five. Probably using about 100 MB of RAM or so
on the server. The interface, changing settings, etc. definitely
performs noticeably slower than 7.x, although it doesn't seem to have
much more impact on the workstations.
Version 8 enforces licensing, so you need to be sure that all the
workstations are properly licensed. Otherwise, the default is a 30 day
trial license, and they'll stop getting signature updates at that point.
There's a thing called "phone home" that you can configure to point to
the SBS (assuming that's where the server part of eTrust is installed).
Then you set the phone home schedule to "disabled," and somehow that
makes it pick up the license from the server install. (This licensing
thing is because you now need to be under a paid support contract in
order to get signature updates).
The best thing about it is that all the parts are upgraded through the
regular distribution, not just signature files. So if there's a driver
update or other part that gets a new version, it'll be installed
automatically when the signatures update.
Also, Exchange is a separate install. If you just run the eTrust
installer once to update the server install, it'll leave Exchange at
7.x. You have to run the installer a second time to upgrade Exchange.
Let me know if you have questions - I've probably messed with this
enough by now that I might be able to help at least a little.
"Al Williams" <donotreplydirect@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:et2F9JJXJHA.5272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Still using CA 7.1 on our SBS 2003 Sp2 Premium - always liked CA
because it works well (once configured which can be a pain) and is
cheap to maintain (no service contract needed for updates).
Was planning on moving to v8.1 in the near future. What sort of issues
do you know of and any tips appreciated. I wasn't aware of the Apache
thing does that cause issues?
--
Allan Williams
"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:%23M%23mxk%23WJHA.868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I doubt there are many SBS'ers using eTrust antivirus, but I'll mention
this just in case. Apparently the 7.x versions are going off support
on December 31, including that the signature files will no longer be
updated. If you're using one of these, you'll have to upgrade to the
newer version or a different product by then. I can comment on version
8 if anyone is interested - it installs Apache on the server, which may
be a deal breaker for some all by itself.
https://support.ca.com/irj/portal/anonymous/phpsupcontent?contentID=172833&productID=156
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- From: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]
- Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- References:
- OT: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- From: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]
- Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- From: Al Williams
- Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- From: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]
- Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- From: Al Williams
- Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- From: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]
- OT: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- Prev by Date: Re: Error Code 403
- Next by Date: Reinstalled SBS 2003, How to restore mailbox store
- Previous by thread: Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- Next by thread: Re: FYI for eTrust AV 7.x Users
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading