Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: Jon-Alfred Smith <jonsmi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:51:32 +0100
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 06:53:50 -0800, "Charlie Russel - MVP"
<charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks so much for clarifying those questions!
jas
Lots of questions there.
5 Gb is too small for any but the smallest production environment, IMO. Fine
for testing, but just too resource constrained for production. 2 GB for the
second server is also pretty small, unless your SQL needs are not at all
extensive.
Performance degradation - some, but not a lot, IME. Assuming you use fixed
disks, and dedicated NICs, and a good disk subsystem.
NICs - you need at least two. One for management of the parent partition,
one for the SBS network. Having three wouldn't hurt, especially if you're
doing lots of I/O to that SQL server.
Fixed disks - always in production. There's a big difference in peformance.
between fixed and dynamic.
- References:
- SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: Andrew Hodgson
- Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: Amnon Feiner
- Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: Charlie Russel - MVP
- Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: AF
- Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: Charlie Russel - MVP
- Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: Jon-Alfred Smith
- Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- From: Charlie Russel - MVP
- SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- Prev by Date: Re: SBS 2008 - restore files from redirected folder
- Next by Date: Re: WINS connection between two SBS baxes
- Previous by thread: Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- Next by thread: Re: SBS 2008: virtualisation using Vmware
- Index(es):