Re: Another RWW Question....

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

Yes, from inside the LAN other people can connect to other workstations AND can definitely connect to the machine we're trying to connect to from the outside. I can also connect to it from the outside with no problems.

Randy


"Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]" <mwport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23unGPpwOJHA.3876@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, I believe you're right Frank. Looks like I was forgetting how TSProxy actually works with RWW.

Inside the Remote Web Workplace - Part I
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2006/07/25/443383.aspx

Randy... can the user connect to other LAN workstations via RWW?

--
Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]
============================

"Frank McCallister" <FrankMcCallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5FD03980-A767-4881-A442-1C8D0C0D7B6C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well that is what I questioned. I thought 3389 was not need at the remote
computer for RWW just 4125 and 443. Mstsc uses 3389 but 3389 is suppkied by
the server after the remote computer connects on 443 and 4125 (I think)
Again I could be wrong there.

--
Frank McCallister [SBS-MVP]
COMPUMAC


"Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]" wrote:

No, your not wrong Frank, I just didn't say what I actually thinking. I
said "remote" PC when I should have said the local PC - the one accessing
RWW, the one at your home, the one not at your office, the one your in front
of, the one you said you'd never allow your kids to touch, the one... :-)

I was thinking a personal firewall on that PC might be blocking 3389
traffic.

--
Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]
============================


"Frank McCallister" <FrankMcCallister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:8908BAC9-8E33-48BA-8143-75AE4AEEEF75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Uh Merv - I am almost always wrong when I question you but on the > remote
> computer I thought only 4125 and 443 was required. I thought 3389 was
> handled
> by the SBS internally after listening on 4125 and 443
>
> -- > Frank McCallister [SBS-MVP]
> COMPUMAC
>
>
> "Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Personal firewall (McAfee, Norton's, etc.) on remote PC blocking port
>> 3389
>> traffic?
>>
>> -- >> Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]
>> ============================
>>
>> "Randy P." <RPlatt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:uppNurtOJHA.3876@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Thanks for the reply Cary,
>> >
>> > I've seen what happens when this is turned off and I think the >> > symptoms
>> > are different but we'll certainly check.
>> >
>> > Randy
>> >
>> >
>> > "Cary Shultz" <cshultz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:e7jY%23StOJHA.4776@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Randy,
>> >>
>> >> Is it possible that she is using a WINXP SP3 box (with SP3 being >> >> the
>> >> key
>> >> here) that has the Internet Explorer Add-on DISABLED? This is a >> >> big
>> >> problem with the installation of Service Pack 3 for WINXP and RWW.
>> >>
>> >> I would check that. So, open up Internet Explorer...go to Tools >> >> |
>> >> Manage Add-ons | Enable or Disable Add-ons and then look for the
>> >> "Microsoft Terminal Server Client Control (you might have to go >> >> to
>> >> the
>> >> "Add-ons that have been used by Internet Explorer" if you do not >> >> see
>> >> it
>> >> in the "Add-ons currently loaded by Internet Explorer".
>> >>
>> >> Make sure that this is ENABLED....the installation of SP3 disables
>> >> this....
>> >>
>> >> HTH,
>> >>
>> >> Cary
>> >> "Randy P." <RPlatt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:OU4fh3sOJHA.3980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> Sorry - she was talking about that security pop-up that you get >> >>> after
>> >>> clicking connect that tells about making local resources >> >>> available.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> "Randy P." <RPlatt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>> news:eRAlr0sOJHA.3496@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>I just re-read an email where the person that is having the >> >>>>trouble
>> >>>>mentioned that on the screen that has the "connect" button it >> >>>>says
>> >>>>"remote connection cannot be identified"
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Randy P." <RPlatt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:e0urYrsOJHA.4264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>>>>I have a client that is having a strange problem with RWW. They >> >>>>>have
>> >>>>>one computer set up in their office for access via RWW and there >> >>>>>are
>> >>>>>multiple users connecting to it with no problem both inside and
>> >>>>>outside
>> >>>>>the internal network. You can also connect to this computer via
>> >>>>>Remote
>> >>>>>Desktop from the inside network. However, there is one person,
>> >>>>>connecting as her boss, which cannot connect. She's getting the
>> >>>>>message: "The client could not connect to the remote computer.
>> >>>>>Remote
>> >>>>>connections might not be enabled or the computer might be too >> >>>>>busy
>> >>>>>to
>> >>>>>accept new connections. It is also possible that network >> >>>>>problems
>> >>>>>are
>> >>>>>preventing your connection. Please try again later." Once >> >>>>>again,
>> >>>>>other
>> >>>>>people, me included, can connect to this computer as that user. >> >>>>>The
>> >>>>>only thing that could be considered unusual in that the server >> >>>>>is in
>> >>>>>Illinois and the remote client that is having the problem is in
>> >>>>>South
>> >>>>>Africa. By chance are there geographic limitations with RWW. I
>> >>>>>wouldn't
>> >>>>>think there were but wanted to ask.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Randy
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Outlook trough VPN
    ... It's working within the LAN. ... then have your remote user ... >>> if so, why use VPN at all, when you can use Outlook over the Internet ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SSH attack
    ... then I don't see how you can safely use ssh at all. ... >> scrutinized, stripped and locked down, dedicated (internet) ssh server, ... I first got the idea from ISPs which allow remote control of customer ... For example, I might use a modem on a system with no LAN connection, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Unable to ping LAN from outside network
    ... Basically, we would need internet access on the LAN, ... >Ports that Enable Remote Access to SBS Services ... >server monitoring and usage reports Enables internal ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: DSL with 3 computers and remote desktop computer
    ... If you want to connect internally, through the LAN, then just run Remote ... Providing the firmware of your router is fairly up to date you should be ... >>I have 3 computer that use the same DSL line to connect to the internet. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely)
  • Re: Connect to Individual LAN Computers Remotely?
    ... > Internet and that server manages the company firewall ... > through Routing and Remote Access. ... > workstations exist on the LAN and have LAN IPs such as 192.168.0.*. ... > outside of the office I will need Internet IPs, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)