Re: RWW with no https

Actually if you can run multiple websites on different ports using
HTTP why cant you do the same with HTTPS? Or you saying you can?


On Oct 13, 3:25 pm, "Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me
at yahoo dot com> wrote:
That clears it up! From what you had said, I thought Kerio was on the same
network, which would have been an easy fix to just change its ports. But now
I understand it is just another web server on the network with SBS.

Yes, your questions have been answered. Actually, that raises one more. If
it is just a web server, why not change its HTTPS port instead of changing
the highly-integrated SBS server?

Or better yet, get a separate IP address and a corporate-grade router to
handle the multiple IP addresses and forwarding.

Gregg Hill

"rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:91fa8c9f-5bd2-4433-bcb8-695159eb5164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry for the confusion but someone did a port scan on me and found I
am running Kerio which is correct.  This question is not related to
the port scan it is for a different network.  The network I am talking
about already has a HTTPS running on another web server that we need
access to from the outside.  The SBS server we would like to have RWW
work without using HTTPS but it seems this is not possible and or I
need another link to access it.  I guess my question has been
answered.
Thanks

On Oct 13, 12:53 pm, "Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me
at yahoo dot com> wrote:

Ross,

You seem to be contradicting your answer to Cris Hanna when he and others
were asking your intent. You stated, "I can not use https. Https goes to a
different server running webmail. Maybe I am confused or wrong but you
cant
have two servers behind a firewall running https and allow outside
connections in." That sounds as though you have a webmail server and an
SBS
server on the **same** network. Later, you stated, "Basically that server
(webmail) is running Https, I still have http open and free to use where
ever. I would like to use it for RWW, is this possible?" That statement
also
makes it sound as though the two servers are on the same network, but now
you say they are totally different.

Can you explain what "Basically that server (webmail) is running Https, I
still have http open and free to use where ever. I would like to use it
for
RWW, is this possible?" really means?

Does the network on which SBS resides have another server or not? If it
does
have another server on the same network, what is it doing that precludes
you
from using the standard ports?

If it is a totally different network, and the webmail server is NOT on the
same network as SBS, then what is the problem with leaving SBS at its
defaults?

Gregg Hill

"rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:b62ca001-d026-440c-8bc4-d52d4ea9b591@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gregg - This is a totally different network.

On Oct 12, 2:14 am, "Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me
at yahoo dot com> wrote:

I got the Kerio reference from your domain name, gruskingroup.com, in
your
email address. You stated, "Yes I use Kerio for the 75GB limitation
Exchange
has but I don't want to get into a debate about that. Basically that
server
(webmail) is running Https, I still have http open and free to use where
ever. I would like to use it for RWW, is this possible?" It sounded as
though it is Kerio and is on the same network as SBS.

So are you now saying that the webmail server and the SBS are NOT on the
same network?

Or are they both on the same network, but it is not Kerio?

Gregg Hill

"rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:9b8f96fb-cd94-4216-a147-5e82fe187957@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gregg - What you think is my URL as stated prior is not it. This is
for an education site as I am posting this for help for them

Cliff - thanks! That is what I suspected

On Oct 11, 1:13 pm, "Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me
at yahoo dot com> wrote:

Ross,

You did not reply to my question regarding changing Kerio's ports
instead
of
SBS's ports. From our 10,000' view (not knowing your details), it
looks
as
though this procedure would be easier to do on Kerio than trying to
hack
SBS.

Is there a reason you cannot use Kerio's method to change its ports?

Gregg Hill

"rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:622eb355-7866-4cf0-b743-3972f32a8cb4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes I use Kerio for the 75GB limitation Exchange has but I dont want
to get into a debate about that. Basically that server (webmail) is
running Https, I still have http open and free to use where ever. I
would like to use it for RWW, is this possible?
Thanks

On Oct 10, 2:51 pm, "Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me
at yahoo dot com> wrote:

I agree, except I silently assumed he had some valid reason. Perhaps
the
two are unrelated systems, i.e., SBS for one domain, Kerio for
another.
Or
maybe using Kerio to get more than 75 limit. We won't know until he
chimes
in with details.

Gregg Hill

"Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]" <crisnospamha...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
in
messagenews:OMK$0RwKJHA.4292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Or dump Kerio Mail Server since you have the same capabilities in
Exchange
;-)

--
Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
Co-Author, Windows Small Business Server 2008 Unleashed
http://www.amazon.com/Windows-Small-Business-Server-Unleashed/dp/0672...

------------------------------------
MVPs do not work for Microsoft
Please do not submit questions directly to me.

"Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me at yahoo dot com>
wrote
in messagenews:%2339ibMwKJHA.5904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A report from dnsstuff.com indicates that you have Kerio Mail
Server.
Would
it not be easier to change Kerio's ports
(http://support.kerio.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=viewarticle&kb...)
than to hack SBS?

Gregg Hill

"rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:300e3428-d13c-4889-9316-39e9542b802d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I can not use https. Https goes to a different server running
webmail. Maybe I am confused or wrong but you cant have to servers
behind a firewall running https and allow outside connections in. I
know if its over http and at port 8080 that will work, or at least I
think I am correct. I am not running SBS 2008, I have 2003. Yes 4125
is now changed to 8080 in the registry but I am not following you on
the proxy part.
Thanks

On Oct 10, 11:42 am, "Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]"
<crisnospamha...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some folks insist on breaking what works so absolutely well. :-)
What is the issue around connecting to the RWW site via SSL?
You're
users
don't like the popup security warning? Or they don't want to take
the
time
to install the certificate on they're local machine to make those
warnings
go away.

SBS 2008 absolutely requires connection by SSL and you won't be
able
to
get to the desktops without the certificate on the remote box

--
Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
Co-Author, Windows Small Business Server 2008
Unleashedhttp://www.amazon.com/Windows-Small-Business-Server-Unleashed/dp/0672...

------------------------------------
MVPs do not work for Microsoft
Please do not submit questions directly to me.

"rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:4974de83-de8e-4984-b99a-e954a846c2dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I basically want to run Remote web workplace over the standard web
port but going to port 8080. I have what I thought changed the
registry setting for RWW from 4125 to 8080 but I want to run the
site
by http and not https. Is this possible?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Outlook 2003 cant see Exch 2003 over RPC
    ... To help you troubleshoot RPC try RPC Ping, ... working on the LAN side is my priority rather than the external HTTPS ... server endpoints and let me see what it's trying to do and perhaps what's ... You stated you did get RPC over HTTP to work for a while when the SBS ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • RE: SSL (and dependent services) problem
    ... I understand that the https and outlook over ... You have to rerun the CEICW to make sure your SBS 2003 server have right ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: RWW with no https
    ... Sorry for the confusion but someone did a port scan on me and found I ... The SBS server we would like to have RWW ... work without using HTTPS but it seems this is not possible and or I ... "Yes I use Kerio for the 75GB limitation ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Outlook 2003 cant see Exch 2003 over RPC
    ... Can I ask a simple question, why are you wanting to run RPC over HTTPs on ... To help you troubleshoot RPC try RPC Ping, ... server endpoints and let me see what it's trying to do and perhaps what's ... You stated you did get RPC over HTTP to work for a while when the SBS ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • Re: Using RPC/HTTP for outlook 2003 to work
    ... RPC over http to work in SBS 2003 environment. ... To configure RPC over http, you need not upgrade to Exchange SP2. ... On the Web Server Certificate page, ... Only the ports 80 and 443 are necessary, if you use RPC over HTTPS, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
Loading