Re: RWW with no https

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

As a point of clarification, you *can* bind multiple SSL ports to an IP. What you cannot normally do is configure an HTTP SSL listeners to redirect traffic based on HTTP headers. This is because HTTP headers are sent *after* the SSL handshake. But as far as SSL goes, it is a protocol like any other, so as long as the ports are different, you can bind as many as you want.

-Cliff


"Susan Bradley" <sbradcpa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uWMjJvxKJHA.5448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
rossk wrote:
Yes I use Kerio for the 75GB limitation Exchange has but I dont want
to get into a debate about that. Basically that server (webmail) is
running Https, I still have http open and free to use where ever. I
would like to use it for RWW, is this possible?
Thanks



On Oct 10, 2:51 pm, "Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me
at yahoo dot com> wrote:
I agree, except I silently assumed he had some valid reason. Perhaps the two are unrelated systems, i.e., SBS for one domain, Kerio for another. Or maybe using Kerio to get more than 75 limit. We won't know until he chimes in with details.

Gregg Hill

"Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]" <crisnospamha...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:OMK$0RwKJHA.4292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Or dump Kerio Mail Server since you have the same capabilities in Exchange ;-)

--
Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
Co-Author, Windows Small Business Server 2008 Unleashed

http://www.amazon.com/Windows-Small-Business-Server-Unleashed/dp/0672...

------------------------------------
MVPs do not work for Microsoft
Please do not submit questions directly to me.

"Gregg Hill" <greggmhill at please do not spam me at yahoo dot com> wrote in messagenews:%2339ibMwKJHA.5904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A report from dnsstuff.com indicates that you have Kerio Mail Server. Would
it not be easier to change Kerio's ports

(http://support.kerio.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=viewarticle&kb...)
than to hack SBS?

Gregg Hill

"rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:300e3428-d13c-4889-9316-39e9542b802d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I can not use https. Https goes to a different server running
webmail. Maybe I am confused or wrong but you cant have to servers
behind a firewall running https and allow outside connections in. I
know if its over http and at port 8080 that will work, or at least I
think I am correct. I am not running SBS 2008, I have 2003. Yes 4125
is now changed to 8080 in the registry but I am not following you on
the proxy part.
Thanks

On Oct 10, 11:42 am, "Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]"
<crisnospamha...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some folks insist on breaking what works so absolutely well. :-)
> What is the issue around connecting to the RWW site via SSL? You're users
> don't like the popup security warning? Or they don't want to take the time
> to install the certificate on they're local machine to make those warnings
> go away.
>
> SBS 2008 absolutely requires connection by SSL and you won't be able to
> get to the desktops without the certificate on the remote box
>
> --
> Cris Hanna [SBS - MVP]
> Co-Author, Windows Small Business Server 2008
> Unleashedhttp://www.amazon.com/Windows-Small-Business-Server-Unleashed/dp/0672...
>
> ------------------------------------
> MVPs do not work for Microsoft
> Please do not submit questions directly to me.
>
> "rossk" <rkovel...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> messagenews:4974de83-de8e-4984-b99a-e954a846c2dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I basically want to run Remote web workplace over the standard web
> port but going to port 8080. I have what I thought changed the
> registry setting for RWW from 4125 to 8080 but I want to run the site
> by http and not https. Is this possible?

Prob is Ross is that all of that network traffic would be going over an insecure connection.

Usernames
Passwords

changing the 4125 control port to 8080 just changes the control port not the SSL binding ports.

Typically you can only have one SSL port bound to an IP address, so without a second IP, an SSL connection isn't possible.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Activesync / Airsync - Alternative Ports
    ... Setup a reverse HTTP proxy. ... Another idea is to use the PPTP capabilities of a Windows Server to allow ... Satellite - Cisco Firewall - Exchange Server ... So on the server side you would configure the port 80 to redirect to ...
    (microsoft.public.pocketpc.activesync)
  • Re: outlook express wont connect using ssl
    ... my smtp VS which is on 587 to the same settings as my default server ... the only difference is the port #. ... As soon as the cert has been added, SSL ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: outlook express wont connect using ssl
    ... my smtp VS which is on 587 to the same settings as my default server ... the only difference is the port #. ... SSL ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: No SSL on fetchmail?
    ... It depends on the port you connect to. ... encrypted via SSL. ... Connect to the server using the specified base ... So, if you want to use fetchmail on an IMAP server without using SSL, ...
    (comp.mail.misc)
  • Re: 2003 Ent Mutimedia Server
    ... Set Up Windows Media Services 9 Series to Use HTTP Streaming on Port ... WMS does not enable the WMS HTTP Server Control ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)