Re: Replace MN-100
- From: Tim <Tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:06:21 -0700
Cris…
Thanks for the help. I picked up a D-Link EBR-2310 router and a D-Link
DSS-16+ switch. Other than shutting down everything before I start
unplugging old stuff and plugging in new stuff, do you have any suggestions
as to procedure (such as order of turning back on, configuring, etc.)? Also,
any comment on the two pieces of equipment? I'll probably do this on
Saturday morning.
Tim
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
I ran into a similar situation with a Netgear router the other day. so probably right on track.
Since you're not doing wireless...no reason to get a wireless router
Here is an option to throw out
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3032704&Sku=D700-2308&SRCCODE=GOOGLEBASE&cm_mmc_o=TBBTkwCjCVyBpAgf%20mwzygtCjCVRqCjCVRq
If you want a unit that goes to the next level and does Unified Threat Managment (virus, spam, etc.) before it gets to the server as well
Then you can go with this
http://www.calyptix.com/ae500.php
And there are options in between
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-------------------------------------------------
Microsoft MVPs
Independent Experts (MVPs do not work for MS)
Real World Answers
---------------------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly regarding issues
"Tim" <Tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:546BB52D-2510-49FA-AD1A-BF57D44D59E5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cris...
I'm not opposed to moving to a business class device - the MN-100 was in
place when I started working here. However, neither our server nor our
workstations have any critical data, client info, etc., so we don't need Fort
Knox either. Bring on the recommendations.
Also, based upon my description of the internet problem, do you agree that
it's probably the MN-100? Thanks.
Tim
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
Understand that the MN-100 is a home (consumer) class (as opposed to a business class) device and provides only the most basic firewall protection.
Anything you would purchase in the same price only provides the same level of protection...very minimal despite it including the words firewall in its list of features
If you are willing to accept those risks..then you can go to best buy and get just about any router.
If you want higher end true firewall protection...then let us know and we can make some recommendations there too
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-------------------------------------------------
Microsoft MVPs
Independent Experts (MVPs do not work for MS)
Real World Answers
---------------------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly regarding issues
"Tim" <Tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:75FBD45D-E4A3-4133-B92E-AD44E7207D4F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have one NIC in the server and no wireless. There are four wired
workstations running WinXP Pro plus the server. Main function is Outlook.
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
Well, there are lots of options
Can you be more exact about what it does for you now? How many nics in the server...whose using the wireless connection and for what?
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-------------------------------------------------
Microsoft MVPs
Independent Experts (MVPs do not work for MS)
Real World Answers
---------------------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly regarding issues
"Tim" <Tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:EA67FD32-79A3-4AE1-9060-D53B08E8D7C6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I need to replace our MN-100 BaseStation for our SBS 2003. Any suggestions?
Thanks
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replace MN-100
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: Replace MN-100
- References:
- Replace MN-100
- From: Tim
- Re: Replace MN-100
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: Replace MN-100
- From: Tim
- Re: Replace MN-100
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: Replace MN-100
- From: Tim
- Re: Replace MN-100
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Replace MN-100
- Prev by Date: Re: Exchange server super duper slow
- Next by Date: Re: User problem in SBS 2003 STD
- Previous by thread: Re: Replace MN-100
- Next by thread: Re: Replace MN-100
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|