Re: anti-spam recommendations
- From: Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:13:47 -0400
In article <#Lk1eeO3IHA.2348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
alex@respond_to_group says...
I would love to know how the filtered spam is being verified to achieve ZERO
false positives.
I hope you are not deleting or rejecting any emails without verification.
All items are recorded before being deleted, review for the first month
after an install, no complaints about missing emails, and in some cases
the email that is spam/bulk is quarantined instead of deleted.
All email suspected of being spam is marked as SPAM: prepended to the
subject line.
--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- References:
- anti-spam recommendations
- From: Gary Karasik
- Re: anti-spam recommendations
- From: Leythos
- Re: anti-spam recommendations
- From: Alexander Zammit [MVP]
- Re: anti-spam recommendations
- From: Leythos
- Re: anti-spam recommendations
- From: Gregg Hill
- Re: anti-spam recommendations
- From: Alexander Zammit [MVP]
- anti-spam recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: anti-spam recommendations
- Next by Date: Re: anti virus for sbs
- Previous by thread: Re: anti-spam recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: anti-spam recommendations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
