RE: Need Help to protect against spammer
- From: thejamie <thejamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 04:04:02 -0700
OK, forget this. That was a malware called Korolev and it was embedded in
the C:\Windows\Expand.exe. I've never heard of it and couldn't find much on
the internet about it but a 64 bit firewall called COMODO found it. It
seems a bit suspicious that there is nothing on the internet about Korolev
malware embedded in the Windows Expand.exe.
--
Regards,
Jamie
"thejamie" wrote:
First off, - not sure spammer is what this is so need someone to help me.
clarify. Mail was denied to ATTNET because my server was reported for
spamming so I am watching my ISA firewall closely. Here is what I notice.
Somone is hitting my wireless workgroup network at 192.168.z.z from msn
messenger. Destination IP is a microsoft ip starting 205... and protocol is
msn messenger. I noticed that my 64 bit xp laptop on this workgroup (which
is always logged into my sbs network via vpn) did not have its guest account
disabled - it is disabled now. Finally the External address it tries to
reach is an IP produced by the DNS from the wireless router's NAT list (as
above 192.168.z.z)
The next event that appears to define the attack is a call to the localhost
over a port from IP 255.255.255.255:Port (UDP)
And then there is the one call from a specific IP address (starts with 69)
(From Rackspace.com, Ltd. out of San Antonio, but need more information to
know if they are hacked too or if they are the spammer)... The 69 IP is the
external source, the 192.168.z.z mentioned above is the Destination.
Fortunately ISA is blocking this pattern that occurs probably three or four
times in a row in a second or two and then repeats a few seconds later ISA
refers to it as Unidentified traffic and denies it but I find it odd that the
pattern recurs so frequently and so my question is, could this be my spammer.
Please note, there are other attacks as well as this one most of them
originating from addresses in China but are more random and appear to only be
probing. The one from 69.x.x.x is far more persistant.
Can anyone tell me what else to look for?
--
Regards,
Jamie
- Prev by Date: Re: Remote SBS connection
- Next by Date: Re: SBS 2003 Branch Office
- Previous by thread: Re: create new customer service mailbox
- Next by thread: Re: Mail Setup
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|