Re: anti virus for sbs
- From: Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:15:40 -0400
In article <Ool1$452IHA.1436@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
MMurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
We are pretty satisfied with the workstation product at the moment, a
licensed version of AVG on the few workstations we have (3). I would NEVER
use a norton product, even on an enemy's computer, although I hear the
corporate edition is not a complete failure.
We manage several Sororities, every computer running updated and active
AVG has been compromised, every year, at least once or more times -
normally through an IM exploit.
None of the computers running Symantec Corp have been compromised during
that time, two running McCrappy were, as one I was just working on
tonight, and Panda, well, we'll not talk about panda.
The residential Symantec/Norton stuff is crap, the BUSINESS stuff is as
good or better than most.
--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- References:
- anti virus for sbs
- From: M. Murphy
- Re: anti virus for sbs
- From: Duncan McC
- Re: anti virus for sbs
- From: M. Murphy
- Re: anti virus for sbs
- From: Gregg Hill
- Re: anti virus for sbs
- From: M. Murphy
- anti virus for sbs
- Prev by Date: Re: anti virus for sbs
- Next by Date: Re: anti-spam recommendations
- Previous by thread: Re: anti virus for sbs
- Next by thread: Re: anti virus for sbs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading