Re: Substantial upgrade of existing SBS server, advice sort
- From: Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:21:10 -0400
In article <abf03fd7-a34d-4d48-9ee6-7b23fd8c8882
@e67g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, suppliers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
Thinking of going to something like a Xeon 5335 2G with 4G memory andRAID - 0 is always a bad choice for a server.
300G Raid0. May have one or two more clients. I would like to stay
with SBS although it will probably be a new license (old one is
OEM).
Get a small server using Dual Quad Core CPU's or Dual Dual Core CPU's -
you want to have 2 CPU's, not just 2 cores.
Get 4GB RAM.
Get as many drives as the server will hold, they are cheap - 4 x XXX
drives in a RAID-5 or even two large drives in a RAID-1 is going to be a
LOT better than anything in RAID-0. Get a caching controller for the
RAID.
--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- References:
- Substantial upgrade of existing SBS server, advice sort
- From: AuditMaster
- Substantial upgrade of existing SBS server, advice sort
- Prev by Date: Re: Migration/Install SBS 2003 & Win Server 2003 Service Pack Question
- Next by Date: Re: OWA issue isolated to Outlook 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: Substantial upgrade of existing SBS server, advice sort
- Next by thread: Re: Substantial upgrade of existing SBS server, advice sort
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|