Re: What backup software do you use and why?



Dave, can you say why ShadowProtect is better than Acronis True Image Server
in your experience? I use Acronis but not ShadowProtect and I'm curious what
it does better than Acronis. Thanks.

"Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D5DBCD4D-10F8-472B-B121-39AD7390B5E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I use ShadowProtect Server on all of my member servers. It's really great
software for a variety of reasons - it's quick, reliable, simple to
configure, and it just works well all the time. I do a full backup of each
server once a week, with 4 incremental backups per day, to a storage server
on the network. At night, the ShadowProtect backups copy out to a High
Rely external SATA drive for offsite storage. I recommend downloading the
trial version and using it for a couple of days, after which you'll be sold
on it. It won't interfere with any other backup software you may be using
now, so the trial isn't much work. It'll uninstall cleanly if you don't
like it, or you can just buy a copy and add the license key to the existing
install. (One thing to note is that it doesn't support tape).
http://www.storagecraft.com/

On my SBS, I'm using Arcserve 11.5. The primary reason why I'm using it
is because I bought it prior to the release of SBS 2003. IMO the backup
in SBS 2003 is so good, I would not spend money for a 3rd party backup
solution if I hadn't owned it previously. Another reason for Arcserve is
brick level Exchange backup. Again with Exchange 2003 and recovery
storage groups, not something I would spend money on. Arcserve on my SBS
is working fine, which is the only reason I have not abandoned it in favor
of the ShadowProtect SBS version.

As an aside, I've had an absolutely horrible experience with Arcserve on
my 64-bit Windows 2003 Storage Server. IMO, although their support
quality has improved greatly over the years, their software quality has
room for improvement.

"Rich" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eOvvRXobIHA.1168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm currently looking for an alternative server backup solution and am
interested to hear what software you are using, and why do you use it?

BTW On my servers I use a mix of NTBackup and Symantec Backup Exec v10 &
v11. Have also tried Acronis True Image Server. And am not in love with
any of them ;-)

--

Rich

http://www.badangling.com
...talking pollocks since 1996





.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Failover Server
    ... ShadowProtect is really a backup, so from the licensing standpoint, it's no ... different than if your server blows up and you restore a tape to new ... Any other domain controllers in the SBS domain would be subject to USN ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Backup Exec vs. ShadowProtect
    ... I have a server with 92 GB of data that I back up using ShadowProtect. ... A full week's backup set, including the full and 28 incrementals, is about 75 GB. ... the size of incremental backups depends on how much data is changed or added to the server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Backup software for SBS2003 Standard
    ... If you end up deciding to go the 3rd party route, I strongly urge you to take a look at ShadowProtect. ... I've grown increasingly dissatisfied with Arcserve, including that I'm running it on a 64-bit server where it's been constant trouble from the beginning. ... Some applications use MSDE or something similar such as Quickbooks Enterprise using SQL for their database. ... When these types of applications are used can something like Backup Exec for SBS 2003 Standard properly backup and restore the databases of such applications or would the Premium version be needed/desired. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Backup software for SBS2003 Standard
    ... Using the built-in backup will save you from having to evaluate, ... bought before I became aware of ShadowProtect. ... a 64-bit server where it's been constant trouble from the beginning. ... Some applications use MSDE or something ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Which BackUp Software
    ... Isn't the Windows 2003 Server version around $700 USD? ... We use Symantec ghost in the moment but switching to acronis true image. ... Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, ... We can schedule a backup with no users on the network. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)

Loading