Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:52:23 +1100
Colin has sent me some pics and info. If I were he I would request of the
seller that they adjust their webpage advertising this product, and for them
to authorise full refund.
Colin carries some degree of fault. The package clearly states 'Maximum 15
Client Access Licenses (CALs); 5 included' on the front of the CD case. This
should have set an alarm bell, SBS2003 is limited to 75 CALs.
MS are the main 'culprit'. The _idiocy_ of not only producing this product
but effectively naming in such similar manner to SBS2003 has been pointed
out to them on numerous occassions.
This post was written before other replies or some other 'more direct'
queries were sent to me. It has been sitting onscreen waiting for Colin's
link to the seller's webpage.
Thankfully, I can't find an AU price for 'Fresno', either that or I am
suffering from the same misdirection as Colin. Seems to me that Colin has
paid a reasonable price for SBS, but been given 'Fresno'.
"SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uGGOkdIYIHA.5784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
OHH, BTW. I would first _again_ offer to return the incorrectly purchasedmake
and specified product, for full refund, while mentioning 'OK, I'm gonna
a claim against PayPal. I believe this was advertised incorrectly.'. Give2003
the guy an 'out', it could be a simple mistake.
"SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:etJbCZIYIHA.5784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NO. You have a claim.
I take it you're talking USBucks. Retail pricing for 'Windows Server
offor Small Business' (or whatever it's called, I don't think I've everat
actually seen the product. Got a scanner? CD and packaging please. mickm
mickmalloy dot dyndns dot org) is not the same as SBS2003.
The CD DOES NOT say SBS2003. He has falsely advertised.
Bend him over and tell him to grab the soap. Fact is he probably knows
saysthe confusion because he purchased the wrong product himself, and is now
trying to offload it.
"Colin A" <noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u4TmuSIYIHA.5348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here's a twist on this one...
I contacted the chap I brought this from....
We did the transaction via Paypal...
I said to him that this is not SBS 2003....?, he said to me "the CD
with....,SBSgot..!"...
2003 on the cover, that's what you ordered and that's what you
$600
He's not prepared to take it back as it is now opened....!!!, so I'm
down on the deal....stand
Now if I made a claim against him on Paypal, I wouldn't have a leg to
on, as the chap is right... I ordered SBS 2003 and that is what I have
got...!!, it says it on the CD, it was genuine and untampered
meit'sSBS
just not the 6 CD version of SBS we all know and love....
This one sits squarly at Microsoft's door as they state it is MS SBS
2003...., but we know it's not.... It doesn't have any of the features
anyhas, no Exchage etc...
There are thousands of copies of this product for sale on the web and
one who buys it falls into the same trap I have...., and it seems to
your
are going to lose your money....
Great!!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: Les Connor [SBS MVP]
- Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- References:
- WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: Colin A
- Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: Charlie Russel - MVP
- Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: Colin A
- Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: Colin A
- Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]
- Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]
- WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- Prev by Date: Re: Restored Server but SharePoint refusing admin access
- Next by Date: Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- Previous by thread: Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- Next by thread: Re: WINDOWS SBS 2003 - T73-00494
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|