Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: Joe <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:49:29 +0100
James Brubaker wrote:
We have a gre tunnel between this main site and the remote sites on our Cisco routers in order to connect the separate subnets for the smaller remote locations. Individual VPN's from each PC are not really feasible, and the sites do not have a servers set up to do VPN's just the routers that do the tunnel.Move the SBS to one NIC mode. SBS with two NICs, whether with ISA or not, is a firewall, and is specifically designed not to allow access to its LAN side from the 'outside'. You can open ports to allow access, but by the time you've opened enough to allow workstations to operate with it, there's absolutely no point in having two NICs.
Our end goal is the following (for one location):
Remote Site - Cisco Router - Cisco Tunnel Endpoint (Remote) - 192.168.20.0 - 192.168.20.1 - 192.168.100.2 -
Cisco Tunnel Endpoint (Main Office) -Cisco Router - SBS Server (External Nic) - 192.168.100.1 - 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.2 -
SBS Server (Internal Subnet)
192.168.0.0
In essence, that the external 192.168.20.0 subnet can communicate with the 192.168.0.0 Subnet.
Are thoughts are that we may need a 3rd NIC to do a static route (although current configured static routes do not work), a Vlan in the 192.168.0.0 subnet on the Cisco Router, or possibly ISA.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: Les Connor [SBS MVP]
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- References:
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: Larry Struckmeyer
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: James Brubaker
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- Prev by Date: Mainpine IQ Express: PCI-Express multi-port fax board for the free Microsoft Fax Server included in SBS
- Next by Date: Re: I'm not going mad am I ? OT
- Previous by thread: Re: Routing across internal subnets
- Next by thread: Re: Routing across internal subnets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|