Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: "Larry Struckmeyer" <lstruckmeyer(at)mis-wizards(dot)com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:09:43 -0400
Hi James:
I am struggling here cause I don't do Cisco. However, this much I do know.
SBS does not play nice with three nics.
Some thoughts:
Keep the tunnel, keep the remotes in workgroups, use RWW. Should be a piece
of cake. You would want a Terminal Server on a member server. Should be
less expensive than a DC in each remote office.
Keep the tunnel, add a DC to each location, join the DC and the clients to
the SBS domain and have them authenticate against the DC
VPN's are a pain.
Larry
"James Brubaker" <JamesBrubaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EA43E5D6-D106-46ED-9D99-18EEF2D790E4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have a gre tunnel between this main site and the remote sites on our
Cisco
routers in order to connect the separate subnets for the smaller remote
locations. Individual VPN's from each PC are not really feasible, and the
sites do not have a servers set up to do VPN's just the routers that do
the
tunnel.
Our end goal is the following (for one location):
Remote Site - Cisco Router - Cisco Tunnel Endpoint (Remote) -
192.168.20.0 - 192.168.20.1 - 192.168.100.2 -
Cisco Tunnel Endpoint (Main Office) -Cisco Router - SBS Server (External
Nic) -
192.168.100.1 - 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.2 -
SBS Server (Internal Subnet)
192.168.0.0
In essence, that the external 192.168.20.0 subnet can communicate with the
192.168.0.0 Subnet.
Are thoughts are that we may need a 3rd NIC to do a static route (although
current configured static routes do not work), a Vlan in the 192.168.0.0
subnet on the Cisco Router, or possibly ISA.
Thanks again in advance.
"Larry Struckmeyer" wrote:
Hi James:
Other than not being able to ping the internal nic from the router, are
you
having any other problems? Can you explain your desired end goal?
Larry
"James Brubaker" <James Brubaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:37DFBF55-63F9-455E-ACCC-AC9510F75728@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here is my configuration, any help is greatly apreciated!!
SBS2003, Two NICS, Inside Private NIC is 192.168.0.1, Outside is
10.10.10.2.
Connected to a Cisco Router With Static IP of 10.10.10.1, Which is
connected
directly to the Internet via static IP.
SBS2003 is DHCP server for Internal Network (192.168.0.0) side, no
problems
with
Internet Access, no problems with VPN to SBS.
From the Cisco router (with the 10.10.10.1 address), we are unable to
ping
the 192.168.0.0 side of the SBS2003. We have the router and the server
configured with RIP version 2, and the SBS2003 shows up on the router
in
the
IP Route as connected.
In the SBS2003, A route to the Cisco router shows up when we do a 'show
neighbors' in RRAS.
We have tried to accomplish this by adding static routes on the SBS2003
in
RRAS using
route -p add 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1
route -p add 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.2
route -p add 10.10.10.1 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0
route -p add 10.10.10.2 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0
but to no avail!!!
Any suggestions or help would be appreciated. We do not have ISA server
installed on the SBS2003 at this point.
Thanks in advance!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: James Brubaker
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- References:
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: Larry Struckmeyer
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- From: James Brubaker
- Re: Routing across internal subnets
- Prev by Date: Re: Outlook 2007 on Vista 64 connecting to HTTPS for email crashes STORE
- Next by Date: Re: How secure is my VPN?
- Previous by thread: Re: Routing across internal subnets
- Next by thread: Re: Routing across internal subnets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
