Re: Protection pilot vs epo
- From: "Henrik" <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:33:54 +0200
Hi,
PP vs Epo, there are big differences.
With Epo you can manage a lot more solutions regarding tasks, stats and
deployments etc etc.
With PP you can centrally manage clients, deployments and some more but not
at all close to as much as with Epo.
Epo is targeting larger and more complexed enviroments where the solutions
demands more. With Epo you can apply and deploy a
vast amount of close other products such as client firewall, IDS/IPS
etc.etc. Thats not possible with PP.
But you can defenetly do a lot with PP for companies/customers at SBS size.
It all depend on your needs, If you wrote some avbout your or/and your
companies needs, I could give you a better answer.
Ive been working with Epo since it was released and before that with Dr
Solomons ME.
I am now working for a local goverment with 17.000 users and aprox.
4500-5000 clients and also aprox. 150-200 servers, all managed with two EPO
servers (3.6.x).
//Henrik
"peter allebone" <allebone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176391155.961278.322190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi
I have searched mcafee's website high and low but cant work out the
difference between Protection Pilot and Epolicy Orchestrator.
Does anyone know what the difference between these 2 products are?
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Protection pilot vs epo
- From: Matthew X. Economou
- Re: Protection pilot vs epo
- References:
- Protection pilot vs epo
- From: peter allebone
- Protection pilot vs epo
- Prev by Date: Re: Use SBS 2003 on a dedicated server located at a hosting compan
- Next by Date: Re: SBS Recovery from dead server
- Previous by thread: Protection pilot vs epo
- Next by thread: Re: Protection pilot vs epo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|