Re: Is Microsoft Office needed on Microsoft Windows Server 2003?

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

tell them it will corrupt theyre email server

--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly, only respond in the Newsgroups
MVPs do not work for Microsoft
------------------------------
Send via Windows Mail on Vista Ultimate connected to SBS 2003 R2
<Jennifer.Berube@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1176230119.532428.169500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 10, 11:56 am, "Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]"
<crisnospamha...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do NOT install Outlook on the server itself

The Outlook client setup files are on the server to install to workstations

Other than that...no

--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly, only respond in the Newsgroups
MVPs do not work for Microsoft
------------------------------
Send via Windows Mail on Vista Ultimate connected to SBS 2003 R2<Jennifer.Ber...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1176217637.719138.321610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



> Just as the title says....is it really needed?

> Thanks!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well when I got here the whole office suite was on there...and still
is. So we have to go through a tricky process to convince people why
it's not needed. There are some application dependencies that need
word or powerpoint but for some reason developers insist that they
need the whole suite. Now I have to come up with a good reason why we
should get rid of office and just install the needed dlls.


.

Relevant Pages