Re: Can I run SBS2003 w/out Exchange
- From: "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:30:44 -0700
Exchange <> SMTP.
There is a native SMTP server that will do quite nicely for notifications.
Which doesn't change my opinion that it's a bad idea to do what he's suggesting.
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
"kj" <kj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23PRq910cHHA.4216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Charlie Russel - MVP wrote:no, it's not a problem. BUT, keep in mind that you can't join the SBS
box to another domain, nor can you set up a trust. But if all you are
worried about is Exchange, then you're fine.
Oh lets see. What about monitoring, reporting, and alerts? Sharepoint Alerts?, Fax?, SBS Backup failure notofocations? I'm sure I overlooked something else that expects smtp and Exchange.
Of course Installing Exchange and actually having the users use it are two different things.
--
/kj
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can I run SBS2003 w/out Exchange
- From: kj
- Re: Can I run SBS2003 w/out Exchange
- Prev by Date: Re: Weird 529 Errors in Security Log
- Next by Date: Re: Can I run SBS2003 w/out Exchange
- Previous by thread: Re: SBS 2003 and SP2
- Next by thread: Re: Can I run SBS2003 w/out Exchange
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|