Re: Router Choices
- From: Leythos <Void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:55:15 -0500
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:39:36 -0700, Russ Grover \(SBITS.Biz\) wrote:
Leythos
I don't know why you keep pushing the user PPTP VPN with Firewalls, when
the SBS PPTP Connector is so easy?
Laugh.
Now if you are connecting two BRANCH offices and not user accounts yes.
But for SIMPLE easy to manage PPTP VPN SBS Rocks at this IMO.
(A Monkey can set it up.)
I guess we all have different Opinions... ;)
Because I don't like users VPN'ing into the server directly - as SBS sits,
there is only one layer of authentication, and that's a problem as far as
I'm concerned.
When remote access is needed to the LAN, I never do a Win based server
endpoint, I always setup VPN to an appliance in front of the server, since
I also never install one without a Firewall capable of VPN Endpoint, it's
easy - I also create a user/password for the firewall that the user
doesn't match on the domain - so, the user account is different and the
password in the firewall they don't control....
This has passed more security audits than I can shake a stick at, even got
a "most secure network we've reviewed" from a homeland security audit team
and two SOX audit teams...
Also, if the server is down, the remote support people can still get into
the network via the VPN Appliance, not a chance if you use SBS for the
end-point.
--
Leythos
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- References:
- Re: Router Choices
- From: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]
- Re: Router Choices
- From: Leythos
- Re: Router Choices
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Firewall Off, Ports Still Closed
- Next by Date: Re: SP1 upgrade
- Previous by thread: Re: Router Choices
- Next by thread: Re: Router Choices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|