Re: Diskpart.exe and Raid 1 Hardware Controller
- From: "Steve Foster [SBS MVP]" <steve.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:34:23 -0800
matchew wrote:
Thank you all for the responses. I have rebooted the server since
extending with no luck. From what I am understanding is I should have
one partition for the OS (20-30 GB) and the 2nd partition for the
rest.
There are many many different ways to organise your partitions, and varying opinions on the "right" number. Most (I think) will agree that you want _at least_ OS + Data.
Disk quotas on users personal folders might be another reason for an additional partition, as these can only be set at the partition level. R2 has an alternative mechanism to disk quotas, FSRM, that is more granular.
--
Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
---------------------------------------
MVPs do not work for Microsoft. Please reply only to the newsgroups.
.
- References:
- Diskpart.exe and Raid 1 Hardware Controller
- From: matchew
- Re: Diskpart.exe and Raid 1 Hardware Controller
- From: Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
- Re: Diskpart.exe and Raid 1 Hardware Controller
- From: matchew
- Diskpart.exe and Raid 1 Hardware Controller
- Prev by Date: Re: Server Management/Monitor Small Business Server - Page cannot
- Next by Date: Re: Server Management/Monitor Small Business Server - Page cannot
- Previous by thread: Re: Diskpart.exe and Raid 1 Hardware Controller
- Next by thread: exchange message send/recieve size limit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|