Re: Security Best Practices; combining server roles (long)



Jim,

Thanks for the reply. I was aware of 1 and 2, thanks for the advice on 3,
and I agree with you on 4. As for 5, that's also very helpful. I think
I'll check into how much resource usage to expect from a typical DNN site
and see if I think my SBS can take it. I think the site sees frequent but
lite usage, so as long as DNN doesn't add a lot of additional overhead it'll
probably work out fine. I do hesitate to use SBS for security reasons, and
to avoid additional complexity on the SBS box, but it may be the lesser of
my evil options. :-) Only employees will use the published site, and even
then the use will seldom be direct (our intranet and published CRM app wrap
the in-out board, which is the main reason I'd like to get it published;
employees are used to it working when in the office and are disconcerted
when it doesn't appear during offsite use of the CRM system. Well, that
reason, and the fact that the owner keeps asking about it. :-) ). I may
check back for advice on the most secure way to implement this if it ends up
being the way I go.

Thanks again.

Bryan


"Jim Martin [MSFT]" <jimmart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p6myHQLVHHA.532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't have a complete solution but I can perhaps give you some guidance
from the SBS perspective.

1. All of the SBS components (IIS, Exchange, Sharepoint, AD, etc,) are
licensed to run only on the SBS server, so there are licensing limitations
that affect what you can move where.
2. You can have multiple DCs in an SBS domain but the SBS server must a
GC
and must own all of the FSMO roles.
3. If you choose to move a website to the SBS server, PLEASE do not
install it on the Default Website. Create a new website in IIS and
install
it there. A lot of the SBS components have virtual directories on the
Default Website and a quick way to break all of that is to make chnages to
the root of that website.
4. I don't know much about your CRM product from a technical perspective,
but I would heed your vendor's advice.
5. Running a publicly accessible website on the SBS server would
certainly
incerase your security exposure, but it is not an uncommon thing and as
long as you configure your website properly you can reduce the risk.

Jim Martin - (MSFT)
jimmart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Microsoft Corporation



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: web address
    ... if you don't currently have a public website that's what the www record is ... Les Connor [SBS MVP] ... On a side note we host our own email on our SBS server, ... So with a .local DNS extension is it possible to accomplish the ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Creating a partition in unpartioned space
    ... Hosting your own website is like leaving the doors and windows on your house unlocked and putting up a huge sign that says, "Hey I have great stuff at my house and the doors are unlocked...COME and GET it" ... You can expect folks to drop payloads, music shares, etc on your server so you get screwed for peer-2-peer sharing, and the list goes on ... None of my customers and very few if any of the other MVPS have customer's who host their own site. ... Send via Windows Mail on Vista Ultimate connected to SBS 2003 R2 ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Exchange, SBS and Reverse DNS - Best Practices??
    ... I'm an IT professional who's come to appreciate SBS 2003 in my own workplace, so I recommended it for a family member's business. ... Their email server's DNS records would pass normal reverse lookup checking, but a reverse lookup of their second-level domain name would resolve to another IP address; in fact, the IP address of their website. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Website Error Code 403 Forbidden
    ... address of the SBS, as you have suggested, and use the router and an ISA ... Website hosting is so close to ... free that it is not worth the risk to a production server. ... problems hosting an internal website for external Internet visitors to view, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Security question re. default website
    ... site SHOULD NOT be hosted on SBS mainly for security reasons. ... What's the difference between hosting a site that I set up and the ... website (which is how it would need to be to let my users access their ... server is not a great idea. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)

Loading