Re: 2 networks on sbs
- From: Trevor <Trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:41:04 -0800
Robert,
Thanks for the reply. Note that my setup is like Jim describes with his
other client. I'm using Cisco switches with Cisco phones, and the computers
plug into the phones.
It is presently working, but I'm getting a lot of errors in the ISA logs
about packets being blocked as spoof attacks between networks.
-Trevor
"Robert Li [MSFT]" wrote:
Hi Trevor,.
Thank you for posting here.
This is Robert Li, Inn Jin is temporarily out of the Newsgroups and I am
his backup.
This is a quick note to let you know that we’re researching your issue and
will get back to you as soon as possible.
I’m sorry for any inconvenience and I appreciate your patience.
Best Regards,
Robert Li
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
====================================================
PLEASE NOTE: The partner managed newsgroups are provided to
assist with break/fix issues and simple how to questions.
We also love to hear your product feedback! Let us know what you think by
posting
from the web interface: Partner Feedback
from your newsreader: microsoft.private.directaccess.partnerfeedback.
We look forward to hearing from you!
====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
so that others may learn and benefit from this issue.
====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
====================================================
--------------------
<From: Jim Behning <jimbehning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
<MIME-Version: 1.0
<Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
<Subject: Re: 2 networks on sbs
<References: <CA827268-63BD-4775-9536-CC987D4D3BF4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<67OWmtsOHHA.2488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<E13CCF14-FBF4-4B9A-950D-C52989254DB2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<In-Reply-To: <E13CCF14-FBF4-4B9A-950D-C52989254DB2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
<Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000707-0, 01/27/2007), Outbound message
<X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
<Lines: 103
<Message-ID: <Xx7vh.18163$w91.16844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:17:59 GMT
<NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.245.114.219
<X-Complaints-To: abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<X-Trace: newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net 1170015479 66.245.114.219 (Sun,
28 Jan 2007 12:17:59 PST)
<NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:17:59 PST
<Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
<Path:
TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFE
EDS01.phx.gbl!msrtrans!msrn-in!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthl
ink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net.POST
ED!f526e822!not-for-mail
<Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:13333
<X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
<
<I have one account with one switch for the phones and another switch for
<the computers. Another account uses Cisco phones and Cisco switches. The
<computers plug in to the phones. The phone use one ip scheme and the SBS
<and workstations use another ip scheme.
<
<Trevor wrote:
<> Inn,
<>
<> Thanks for the reply. Actually, the scenario is more like...
<>
<> [Internet]------[SBS]------[LAN1 and LAN2]
<>
<> The 10.10.0.x network is for VoIP. The 192.168.0.x network is for data.
<> They share the same switch in the LAN.
<>
<> I was hoping to avoid having to manually create a routing rule for each
<> client on the network. Is there no way around that?
<>
<> -Trevor
<>
<> ""Inn Jin [MSFT]"" wrote:
<>
<>> Hi Trevor,
<>>
<>> Thank you for posting.
<>>
<>> From the description, I understand this issue is that you cannot make
two
<>> networks access each other, because ISA blocked and want to know how to
do.
<>> If I am off base, please don't hesitate to let me know.
<>>
<>> First, could you tell me what your network topology is, this is very
<>> important, since if ISA configuration is closely related to the network
<>> topology, we cannot give you suggestions until completely understand
what
<>> the network topology like. Otherwise, we may deliver you wrong
information
<>> and may cause your confusing. Thank you for your understanding.
<>>
<>> Following are two sample network topology scenarios for your reference:
<>>
<>> 1. _______[LAN1]
<>> |
<>> [Internet]--------[SBS]
<>> |_______[LAN2]
<>>
<>> In this scenario, you have three NICs, you cannot run CEICW if you
enable
<>> all three NICs, you have to disable one internal NIC and run CEICW.
After
<>> CEICW, enable that internal NIC, configure ISA include the new LAN as
<>> internal network, then create routing rule manually.
<>>
<>> 2. [Internet]------[SBS]------[LAN1]-------[Router]------[LAN2]
<>>
<>> In this scenario, you need add a permanent routing rule on all LAN1
clients
<>> and SBS server pointing to LAN2, also on the router.
<>>
<>> I hope you can give me your network topology graphic, If you have some
<>> graphics describe your network topology and cannot post in the
newsgroup.
<>> Please compress them and send to my working mailbox
v-innjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<>>
<>> More information:
<>>
<>> Getting Started Guide
<>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/isa/2004/plan/gettingstarted_1.mspx
<>>
<>> Best Practices for Configuring Networks in ISA Server 2004
<>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/isa/2004/plan/bp_networks.mspx
<>>
<>> I appreciate your time. I am happy to be of assistance to you and look
<>> forward to your reply.
<>>
<>> Have a nice day!
<>>
<>> Best regards,
<>>
<>> Inn Jin (MSFT)
<>>
<>> Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
<>>
<>> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
<>> =====================================================
<>> This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
<>> regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the
corresponding
<>> newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely
manner.
<>> You can locate the newsgroup here:
<>>
<>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
<>>
<>> When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check
the
<>> "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there
are
<>> any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your
newsreader,
<>> please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
<>> issue.
<>>
<>> Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
<>> provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
<>> different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In
doing
<>> so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
<>>
<>> For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly.
Please
<>> check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
<>> Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
<>> =====================================================
<>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
<>>
<>>
<
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2 networks on sbs
- From: Robert Li [MSFT]
- Re: 2 networks on sbs
- References:
- RE: 2 networks on sbs
- From: "Inn Jin [MSFT]"
- RE: 2 networks on sbs
- From: Trevor
- Re: 2 networks on sbs
- From: Jim Behning
- Re: 2 networks on sbs
- From: Robert Li [MSFT]
- RE: 2 networks on sbs
- Prev by Date: Re: Remote Web Workplace Computer List
- Next by Date: RE: Configuring Server Monitoring Functionality
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 networks on sbs
- Next by thread: Re: 2 networks on sbs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading