Re: SBS VPN vs Router VPN
- From: "Garbis" <garbis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Jan 2007 08:12:54 -0800
I'm using a PIX 506e for VPN access, and it works flawlessly.
Configure the PIX for remote vpn access, then install the client on the
laptop, configure it, and press connect. It then creates a tunnel with
the network at the office, so it's just like working from the office.
Mapped drives work again, etc.
It's easy enough that the user just knows to click the cisco vpn icon
on their desktop, press connect, and that's all that's needed.
On Jan 24, 10:28 am, Dabbler <Dabb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm moving a network to a new office, adding a Firewall/VPN router and would
like to have the clients use router as VPN endpoint instead of SBS. Currently
they are logging on to SBS 2003 Standard using PPTP/CHAPS and the router's
client uses L2TP/IPsec.
Are there any hints/tips I should observe when doing this? How do the
clients log on to SBS if the routers VPN client software logs on to the
router? Do the clients "see" the SBS for file sharing, COM+ etc at the server?
Thanks much.
.
- Prev by Date: Allowing users to install a plug-in?
- Next by Date: Re: Serious Daily Performance Problems
- Previous by thread: Allowing users to install a plug-in?
- Next by thread: Re: SBS VPN vs Router VPN
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
