Re: Exchange SMTP
- From: "Marek Staniewski" <remove-it.marek.staniewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:42:31 +0100
Thank you for advice, but I would strongly preffer to use POP3 for loading
e-mail. There are many reasons behind.
Marek Staniewski
U¿ytkownik "Steve" <newsgroup@xxxxxxxxxx> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
news:uJS4Y4zOHHA.4644@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm sure Lanwench will answer as well. Get off of POP and switch to full
SMTP which is what Exchange is designed to use best.
"Marek Staniewski" <remove-it.marek.staniewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:esxatvzOHHA.780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We are using SBS 2003 in our organiation. The mail is received by an
exchange POP3 connector.
So far all our accounts were keept by our internet provider.
Unfortunately recently our IP decided that the mail can be sent only as
"authorized".
As exchange enables to use only one authorization therefore it is now not
possible to have separate accounts for each e-mail user.
So we were forced to use a "catch all function" and load all our mails
from one account. This mean all mail whioch has a domain "@derco.pl" is
going now via POP3 connector.
From this change we started to receive a lot of spam. There are also
other problems.
We are looking for a way to enable Exchange to make multiple user
authorization.
I have heard that there is some Exchange connector enabling such a
function. Does anybody know what it is?
Marek Staniewski
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Exchange SMTP
- From: Marek Staniewski
- Re: Exchange SMTP
- From: Steve
- Re: Exchange SMTP
- From: Anna Clark
- Re: Exchange SMTP
- References:
- Exchange SMTP
- From: Marek Staniewski
- Re: Exchange SMTP
- From: Steve
- Exchange SMTP
- Prev by Date: Re: SKYPE through ISA 2004
- Next by Date: Re: SKYPE through ISA 2004
- Previous by thread: Re: Exchange SMTP
- Next by thread: Re: Exchange SMTP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|