Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: "markm75" <markm75c@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Jan 2007 05:32:55 -0800
Leythos wrote:
In article <1168398485.459541.111200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
markm75c@xxxxxxx says...
***
My next goal will be to figure out Symantec Exec Pricing.. (Do they
charge you for one server license, in our case this backup server
license, or is it that plus the other servers that will be backed up as
well)...
Each server needs to have a Symantec license or an adapter license.
Also.. Will NTBackup allow the backing up of data to specific tapes in
the library.. what features compared to Symantec would I be losing?
Not sure on that one, I've only done backup with it to a single tape or
to drive locations.
Has anyone heard of Snapshots (Shadow copy related) in 2003 server? Is
this only for SANS that come preloaded with Storage Server 2003 (oem
deal)?
Not sure.
--
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx
remove 999 in order to email me
I sortof asked this before.. but I'm curious.. you said the agents on
the other servers will activate and run the backups on those machines?
Have you done comparisons to see which method is faster.. either
running backups of all the data on all the other servers via Symantec
on the "backup server" or running the backup from the external/other
servers sending their data to the backup server, rather than the backup
server pulling it from them?
I'm not sure if this would make a difference or not.
Thanks
.
- References:
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Prev by Date: Re: Exchange OMA issue
- Next by Date: Re: Adding a new 2003 file server to an existing 2003 domain
- Previous by thread: Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Next by thread: Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|