Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: "Steve Foster [SBS MVP]" <steve.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:38:21 -0800
markm75 wrote:
Yeah LTO-3 is what I was considering.. but the cost per tape, I believe
was kinda high, considering the number of them we'd need for a full
backup set (two of them to alternate offsite each week, etc).
I'm pretty sure our 350gb backup that we do runs about 10 hours or more
to SATAII's.. I forget, but I think the specs on some LTO's were only
around 20mB/s, so that would take 2x as long if so.
LTO3 from Quantum is rated at 68MB/s native.
LTO2 from Quantum is rated at 26MB/s native.
The best 3.5" 7200rpm drives are managing about 70MB/s write performance (that's WD Raptors, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10)
--
Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
---------------------------------------
MVPs do not work for Microsoft. Please reply only to the newsgroups.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Anna Clark
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Anna Clark
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Anna Clark
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Prev by Date: How to start IsmServ?
- Next by Date: Re: How to start IsmServ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Next by thread: Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Index(es):