Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: "markm75" <markm75c@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Jan 2007 09:36:26 -0800
Steve Foster [SBS MVP] wrote:
markm75 wrote:
Yeah LTO-3 is what I was considering.. but the cost per tape, I believe
was kinda high, considering the number of them we'd need for a full
backup set (two of them to alternate offsite each week, etc).
I'm pretty sure our 350gb backup that we do runs about 10 hours or more
to SATAII's.. I forget, but I think the specs on some LTO's were only
around 20mB/s, so that would take 2x as long if so.
LTO3 from Quantum is rated at 68MB/s native.
LTO2 from Quantum is rated at 26MB/s native.
The best 3.5" 7200rpm drives are managing about 70MB/s write performance
(that's WD Raptors, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10)
--
Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
---------------------------------------
MVPs do not work for Microsoft. Please reply only to the newsgroups.
Thanks for the LTO3 specs...
(Anyone) Any experience using Quantum DLT-S4 drives? They come in at
around 111 MB/s native and hold 800gb native..
Seems like they may be the fastest "tape" approach...
Media runs about $82 bucs for one tape too (800/1600) ($52 for the
LTO3 400/800)
With the 800GB size drive.. I guess this would fit more nicely into a
weekly backup set to take off site.. assuming 1.2 TB of data.. I could
fairly easily figure out how many tapes that would be each week to
rotate..
I guess another approach (if faster).. would be a sata or scsi array
for the backups.. then backup the array to a tape library (assuming the
array would be faster than the tape). Of course the cost goes up a bit
more, but it provides more of a double assurance factor (even though,
technically we already have single drive internal backup units, but
these are beginning to run low on space at the end of 1 month, our full
backup cycle period).
.
- References:
- Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Anna Clark
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Anna Clark
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Anna Clark
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: markm75
- Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- From: Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
- Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Prev by Date: Re: Two SBS 2003 Servers in Single Domain
- Next by Date: Re: Junk emails relay list
- Previous by thread: Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Next by thread: Re: Tape vs HDD vs NAS (speed considerations and size etc)..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|