Re: Trend Micro spam filter
- From: "Tsunami Australia" <tsunami_australia-at-yahoo.com-dot-au>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:24:51 +1100
I will agree with you on that one, I used a trial of ScanMail itself here
for about a month and it was useless, as in didn't do a bloody thing. So I
dumped ScanMail and put on a full copy of CSM for SMB and the difference was
unbeleivable. Maybe try a trial of CSM for SMB for comparison Joel and see
if your results are similar to mine.
Glen.
----------------------
"Joel31622" <Batista@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23TjS4sBEHHA.3836@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, I'm kind of surprised at your responses. I have been using a
trial version of Trend Micro Scan Mail for the past 1.5 weeks and I am
sorely disappointed with it's spam filtration. Out of the 9340 pieces of
mail it has scanned, it has only flagged 645 as spam. I know that at
least 2/3 of all the mail we receive is spam. I have tuned and tweaked
everything I can, but the onslaught of spam persists. ScanMail appears to
only have "Low, Medium, and High" as its spam filter levels. It does not
allow you to filter by SCL.
Don't get me wrong, It's antivirus engine has been working beautifully but
its antispam has me thinking twice about purchasing it.
~Joel~
Tsunami Australia wrote:
I've been using CSM for SMB here for only a short time (2 or so weeks) on
our SBS server. And I would have to say it is the best I've come across
yet. I've tried a few others, Symantec, GFI etc for bits and peices, but
found them to hog resources, not protect the server (including spam
scanning) and just behave generally unruly.
So now our only security products are CSM for SMB and TMAS for SMB, and I
won't be looking back.
----
"Andrew M. Saucci, Jr." wrote:
I finally had a chance to install Trend Micro's mail scanning
component on our SBS2003 and was pleasantly surprised at how effective
the
spam filtering seems to be. How many of you are using that as your only
spam
filter? Any other comments? Until now, when a client requests spam
filtering, we've been using a paid outside vendor for spam filtering
before
it even reaches the Exchange server. We've been using Symantec Mail
Security
on the inside, but as I've mentioned I've been looking at competitors
because I'm just too annoyed with Symantec's licensing procedures and
the
software isn't so good that I need to stick with it at all costs. I do
have
one guy paying $300-$400/month for spam filtering and "business
continuity"
but he's starting to think the bill is too high (it was his idea
originally)
and I'm thinking that Trend Micro C/S/M may be the way to go for him.
(His
Symantec license expires in the next month or so.)
.
- References:
- Trend Micro spam filter
- From: Andrew M. Saucci, Jr.
- Re: Trend Micro spam filter
- From: Joel31622
- Trend Micro spam filter
- Prev by Date: Re: Turning on Remote Desktop Remotley
- Next by Date: Re: Trend Micro spam filter
- Previous by thread: Re: Trend Micro spam filter
- Next by thread: Re: Trend Micro spam filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|