Re: Trend Micro spam filter

Someone correct me if I'm wrong (I'm relatively new to Trend Micro)
but isn't C/S/M a different product than Scan Mail?

"Joel31622" <Batista@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23TjS4sBEHHA.3836@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, I'm kind of surprised at your responses. I have been using a
trial version of Trend Micro Scan Mail for the past 1.5 weeks and I am
sorely disappointed with it's spam filtration. Out of the 9340 pieces
of mail it has scanned, it has only flagged 645 as spam. I know that at
least 2/3 of all the mail we receive is spam. I have tuned and tweaked
everything I can, but the onslaught of spam persists. ScanMail appears
to only have "Low, Medium, and High" as its spam filter levels. It does
not allow you to filter by SCL.

Don't get me wrong, It's antivirus engine has been working beautifully
but its antispam has me thinking twice about purchasing it.

~Joel~

Tsunami Australia wrote:
I've been using CSM for SMB here for only a short time (2 or so weeks)
on our
SBS server. And I would have to say it is the best I've come across yet.
I've
tried a few others, Symantec, GFI etc for bits and peices, but found
them to
hog resources, not protect the server (including spam scanning) and just
behave generally unruly.

So now our only security products are CSM for SMB and TMAS for SMB, and
I
won't be looking back.

----

"Andrew M. Saucci, Jr." wrote:

I finally had a chance to install Trend Micro's mail scanning
component on our SBS2003 and was pleasantly surprised at how effective
the
spam filtering seems to be. How many of you are using that as your only
spam
filter? Any other comments? Until now, when a client requests spam
filtering, we've been using a paid outside vendor for spam filtering
before
it even reaches the Exchange server. We've been using Symantec Mail
Security
on the inside, but as I've mentioned I've been looking at competitors
because I'm just too annoyed with Symantec's licensing procedures and
the
software isn't so good that I need to stick with it at all costs. I do
have
one guy paying $300-$400/month for spam filtering and "business
continuity"
but he's starting to think the bill is too high (it was his idea
originally)
and I'm thinking that Trend Micro C/S/M may be the way to go for him.
(His
Symantec license expires in the next month or so.)





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Debian and spam
    ... The good news is that there are many ways of dealing with spam using ... bogofilter - a fast Bayesian spam filter ... exim4-base - EXperimental Internal Mailer -- a Mail Transport Agent ... sa-exim - Use spamAssassin at SMTP time with the Exim v4 MTA ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Plusnet - praise where its due
    ... Is there a way of training your spam filter? ... Maybe by getting customers ... that may indicate that the server has failed. ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)
  • Re: Spam
    ... has the best spam filter of all providers; ... spam filter", read a few of the articles in the result set, and make ... No gmail here http://www.consumersearch.com/www/software/spam-filters/ ... It depends on your ISP and the anti-spam technologies they employ. ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.misc)
  • Re: Good SPAM filter for Outlook for use in a small non-profite ORG
    ... I am looking for a "Good" SPAM filter for Outlook. ... Email comes in and is scanned for both SPAM and Viri. ... EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE ... Is there a way to implement RBL within an email client? ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Plusnet - praise where its due
    ... Is there a way of training your spam filter? ... Maybe by getting customers to forward spam which has not been trapped to a "this is spam" email address so the filter gets refined. ... I suppose you could in theory do some fancy network traffic monitoring, looking for incoming traffic from customers *to your own servers* and matching against the corresponding response: if there's no response within a stated time, that may indicate that the server has failed. ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)