Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- From: "Jeff Teel" <jdteel@RMoveThis sugardog.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:39:35 -0500
Yes...it was a banking/financial site that didn't like IE7 having TLS 1.0
being used.
Just to be fair...RickF made mention of the memory footprint being smaller
so I won't take credit for that!!
Thanks
Jeff
"kj" <kj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OmNVVsqDHHA.4604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Jeff, good to know. This was a banking / financial site TLS
problem, right?
Just as I was warming up to my test box and IE7, and now WSUS "release
management" issues likely are going to give it a bit of a black eye come
next week.
I do see the memory advantages you mentioned earlier.
--
/kj
"Jeff Teel" <jdteel@RMoveThis sugardog.com> wrote in message
news:eWs$bGqDHHA.3396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello again kj
I found a cure for the issue I was having with IE 7. It seems that if
TLS 1.0 is checked in the Advanced Setings if IE it would cause the
problem that I was having.
"kj" <kj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23I5ISgmDHHA.4024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
BTW, Admins using WSUS to deploy IE7 might want to temporarily block
further IE7 updates. It seems a recent update in the IE7 update is
causing update failures with a pop message in Spanish even though it is
not for that language.
Obviously this is just a temporary issue, but with a long holiday
weekend observed in the States coming up, you might not want to have to
deal with this for the next couple of days. Likely Susan will jump in
with "all clear" or details when they are known.
--
/kj
"Jeff Teel" <jdteel@RMoveThis sugardog.com> wrote in message
news:%23mwfgWfDHHA.3492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And the IE 7 discussion continues!!! Again....it is great to hear
everyone's view point regarding Microsoft's new browser. Although we
have strayed a bit from the original post about installing it on SBS
there are many things to consider before installing the browser.
When I left my first post I had not had any issues with IE7 and how it
operated. Tonight I discovered that there is a certain part of a
secure web site that I am not able to access. It is a local banking
web that hosts their banking data on one domain name and their monthly
electronic statements on another domain. When clicking to view your
electronic statement it will load part of the page (such as menus and
header of the page) but the area where the electronic statements are
to show the message appears (Internet Explorer cannot display this
page). Netscape won't display it at that same point either but Firefox
will and IE6 will as well. I have contacted the bank to see if they
are aware if this so we'll see what they have to say hopefully
tomorrow!!
Jeff
"Tony" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23XfGj%23ZDHHA.1224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A third option is to install Firefox together with the brilliant "IE
Tab"
extension. This enables you to use Firefox but quickly change
rendering
engine when you encounter a non-standard web page. That's how I'm
writing
this at the moment, which is probly why thur's lods of speling
mistukes.
I do use FF on my workstation with IE Tab extension. My only concern
is when accessing a SSL site (like RWW) and I double click the little
lock icon in the status bar, a dialog box pops up that has the
security tab chosen and this message:
Connection Not Encrypted
The web site ietab does not support encryption for the page you are
viewing.
Information sent over the Internet without encryption can be seen by
other people while it is in transit.
For this reason I keep a copy of IE on my laptop, so when I am out of
the office and connecting back for work I know (hope) it is encrypted.
Other than that I find FF far superior to IE7 or 6 . . .
Tony
"NoJags Neil" <NoJagsNeil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:F60F0DA5-A56F-47D1-89C8-84E544CF4CA9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As a preference I'd install Firefox, which is a superior browser in
all ways:
the new spellchecker on webforms is a killer. Of course, that breaks
all the
non-standard Sharepoint stuff in Companyweb. Given that, the
security
improvements and phish filter in IE7 imo make it far preferable to
IE6 and
no, I haven't had any problems with IE7.
A third option is to install Firefox together with the brilliant "IE
Tab"
extension. This enables you to use Firefox but quickly change
rendering
engine when you encounter a non-standard web page. That's how I'm
writing
this at the moment, which is probly why thur's lods of speling
mistukes.
"Rick F" wrote:
I was wondering what the majority of everyone is doing.
Are you installing IE7 on your Small Business Server with Windows
Updates?
I am trying it out on my server (even though I very rarely use IE
from my
server nor my clients) and so far I haven't seen any issues. I
always try
updates on my own SBS before any of my clients. :-)
--
Rick Faria - MCSE / A+
RDF Technical Services - www.rdfts.com
Email: support at rdfts dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- From: Rick F
- Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- References:
- IE7 on SBS
- From: Rick F
- Re: IE7 on SBS
- From: Tony
- Re: IE7 on SBS
- From: Jeff Teel
- Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- From: kj
- Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- From: Jeff Teel
- Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- From: kj
- IE7 on SBS
- Prev by Date: RE: Setup can not copy file: ntkrnlpa.exe
- Next by Date: Re: Could not create mailbox alias as microsoft@mydomain
- Previous by thread: Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- Next by thread: Re: IE7 on SBS - WSUS Heads Up !
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|