Re: Upgrading from Win2k SBS server to Win2k3 SBS server
- From: "EvilNem" <evilnem1979@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:57:45 +1100
You can't run two SBS on the same network under the same domain, SBS has to
have all the FSMO roles itself. What sort of data are you talking about
moving? user data? databases? files? programs?
More information would probably help determine the best course of action.
E.
"jeffk" <jeffk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1C65C545-1B7F-497E-9FDC-5B853C57D3C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Don't want a swing migration. The server was set up incorrectly by
someone
who didn't know what they were doing. There are some user accounts that
are
corrupt, alot of users have rights they shouldn't, and management wants to
start fresh. There are alot of duplicate data files in different places
that
are being consolidated as we speak, so there is a lot of data that isn't
coming across. I just want to be able to copy the data needed over while
the
two servers are both up and running without having to use sneakernet to do
it. Can both of the servers use the same domain name of xyz.local to do
this, as long as they have different computer names?
"Steve" wrote:
The best way is with a swing migration-its well worth the cost:
www.sbsmigration.com
"jeffk" <jeffk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A66CBC64-C7A0-4F5A-85CF-E86B5FEB3C6E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have an old Win2k SBS server that I am going to replace with a new
Win2k3
SBS server. Can I use the same domain name on the new server that is
currently on the old server? If so, how long can I run both computers
before
any trouble starts happening?
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: How do I resolve my .local site
- Next by Date: Re: Upgrade from SBS 2003 to SBS 2003 R2
- Previous by thread: Re: Upgrading from Win2k SBS server to Win2k3 SBS server
- Next by thread: Re: Upgrading from Win2k SBS server to Win2k3 SBS server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
