Re: ????SATA or SCSI????

Les,

If the drives had been SATA and one had failed in a week, would you still be
of the opinion that it is not significant?

Gregg Hill



"Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]" <les.connor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message news:OXncd5d$GHA.4604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I just deployed a server with SAS drives. I'm hoping the technology is
reliable - it's certainly fast :-). The choice was between SCSI or SAS,
SATA wasn't considered. The SAS drives/raid controllers offer a degree of
configuration flexibility not previously available - and as SAS is touted
as the technology that will replace SCIS, the choice was made.

I did have 1 of 8 drives fail within a week, but obviously that can't be
considered significant at this early stage.

--
Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
-----------------------------------------------------------
SBS Rocks !
----------------------
"Tell me and I'll forget. Show me and I'll remember. Involve me and I'll
understand." - Confucius


"SimonR" <Simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uzT7abd$GHA.5068@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SCSI

IDE/SATA is fine for TOYS!!

The drives are NOT designed for 24/7 x 365 use and they are slow
(7200RPM)

Western Digital produce RAPTOR drives - these are FASTER 10K RPM (speed)
and designed for 24/7 x 365

I always recommend SCSI - having said that my Server uses IDE - but its a
TOY!

If budget is low just use 2 drive in Mirror (RAID-1) setup

and finally - TAPE backup don't use USB HDD
for what they cost I replace tapes every year - the old ones get used for
MONTH END backup

*** You can't have too many backups ***



"Michael Tovey" <michael.spamtovey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:2676FC05-A260-490F-8166-7BEC5833068D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,

I have just had another SATA HDD crash on me in my SBS- 2003 STD server
and
I was wondering!

Have any other people had problems with SATA when used to hold data in
their
SBS server.

I have been told by a furm that we sometime use when I get a bit tight
on
time that SATA is NO good to be used on Data servers and that we NEED
SCSI
Raid 5!

We have about 10GB MAX on the disks and only about 12 people accessing,
and
maybe only 5 at the same time!

What do you all think??????
--
SBS 2003 - Admin
SVR 2003 - Admin
SQL 2005 - Admin







.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How can I back up SBS 2008 VM inside Hyper-V Server 2008 R2
    ... which is the USB drive plugged into Hyper-V Server 2008. ... After it was created, I went into Disk Manager in SBS, activated it, ... the drives being swapped but Server 2008 won't. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS 2008 Backup - restore utility?
    ... If you've already installed a fresh copy of SBS 2008 on another server, ... the Recovery Wizard in Windows Server Backup to recover files and folders ... On the Specify location type window, choose "Local drives" and clik ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: slow disk response
    ... Same for the SBS CALs. ... once i have the new server up i will add a note to this ... great with PATA HD and mobo driver is unlikely to improve things much. ... drives passed. ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)
  • Re: SYSTEM DISK FREEZES WITH HEAVY IO ON DISK
    ... from PATA to SATA in my home office server with SBS 2003 SP1. ... and installed a single SATA drive on the motherboard SATA ... I now have an Adaptec RAID controller and two SATA drives, ... With servers a re-install is a major task -- and I would assume Microsoft ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Determin drive letter using DeviceHarddiskVolume##
    ... drives in the RAID array. ... replaced during the time they were bringing the server back up. ... On a workstation of the SBS domain, Event ID 55 is recorded that indicates ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)