Re: Newbie has general question

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



Don't use the the old DAT tape drive in the new server (if that's what you
had in mind). Buy new. That tape drive has small capacity and may be worn
out if it was original equipment. Also, drivers may or may not be available
for Windows 2003. External USB hard drives can work well, although
transporting them offsite for disaster recovery is more probelmatic than
with tapes. However, with a little planinng, external USB drives can work
just fine.

--
Merv Porter [SBS-MWP]
============================


"Vic Baron" <vgbaron@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uK9PKGp0GHA.4956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current tape drive is a 4mm DAT drive - should be ok.

Vic

"dvw" <dan(removethis)@westerveltconsulting.com> wrote in message
news:eueA7Go0GHA.4796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you go with a tape drive for backup, make sure to get a good one, not
something like Travan. Not to start a big debate, but many of us are
successfully using portable USB hard drives for backup instead of tape
drives these days, especially with small businesses that don't have huge
data backup volumes. Others still prefer tape.
"Vic Baron" <vgbaron@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23sbh8bg0GHA.1300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I work for a CPA and am currently running a small network ( 5 users - set
up as a workgroup) under NT Server 4. The hardware is antique - dual P3
450Mhz CPU, 15 g RAID 5 drives, tape backup etc. With the current tax and
accounting software, we are experiencing a real slowdown on network
traffic. I have been tasked to research, procure and install a new
network.

Considering the size of our operation, would SBS 2003 R2 be a good step
up from NT Server 4 or overkill?

On the hardware side - should I buy components or would I be better off
with something like a Dell Server or HP server product.

Any thoughts appreciated.

Thanx,

Vic Baron


--
There are 10 kinds of people - those who understand binary and those who
don't







.



Relevant Pages

  • Windows 2003 Server slow backup performance
    ... Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition. ... Ultra 320 SCSI hard drives. ... 320 SCSI controller card, and added a Sony TSL-S11000 DDS-4 Autoloader ... Adaptec Controller Card to the tape unit. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: Offsite backup options
    ... you'd want to run it on a workstation so you don't hang the server, ... I like Exabyte VXA Drives for this. ... Until our backups start to exceed a single tape I just wanted to use ... the Built-In SBS Backup which works pretty good for our current needs. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: LTO3 vs DLT-S4? (Magnum 224 vs a SuperLoader3)?
    ... software writes the disk data to tape. ... stop and backup, etc). ... HD 750GB SATA II drives. ... The source server example is a Compaq DL380 G3 ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
  • Re: LTO3 vs DLT-S4? (Magnum 224 vs a SuperLoader3)?
    ... software writes the disk data to tape. ... stop and backup, etc). ... HD 750GB SATA II drives. ... The source server example is a Compaq DL380 ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
  • Re: Best Backup Practices
    ... I get a reasonably good tape system in the $600-900 range will it be faster, ... server, smaller media, easier to store in the safety deposit box..." ... >> I should have stated that the reason you use alternating backup devices ... >> expensive than a couple of external USB hard drives. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)