Re: Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- From: "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:30:41 +1000
all versions of SBS have supported additional domain controllers.
Don't eat yourself up too much about it though, it's one of the most widely
misunderstood aspects of 'SBS limitations'. SBS has always been 'king of the
hill', MS used to use a thoroughly fictional idea about it being 'first DC
in the domain' and in the NT days (SBS 4.x) this was effectively (though
possibly not with some creative thought) true.
An SBS must hold all FSMO roles and be a GC. Additional DCs in the domain
cannot be FSMO holders (because the roles are exclusive at either the forest
or domain level and SBS supports only single domain, single forest) but can
be GCs (a non exclusive role).
You know what the funny part is? You don't need CALs to access those
additional DC (or member server) machines, SBS CALs cover access to all
Win2K or later servers in the SBS domain.
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156767372.103517.227820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was under the impression that a BDC could not be added to a Small
Business Server Domain. Is this only true with SBS 2003?
Charlie Russel - MVP wrote:
You can't move the AD off of SBS. Period. But you _could_ add Server 2k3
as
a secondary domain controller, and have it do Print and File, and VPNs.
You
should keep DHCP with your SBS box, and DNS should be AD integrated and
thus
present on both boxes. You could certainly set the DHCP to have your new
server as the primary DNS for clients, though I wouldn't normally
recommend
it. But if for some reason the new, secondary, domain controller had to
be
removed, it's easy enough to deal with.
VPNs - you can put this wherever you want. So if you move it off to the
new
box, that's fine. But you won't have the CEICW to configure stuff for you
there, I'm afraid. :(
--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I have a situation where we have outgrown a Windows 2000 SBS Server. We
have about 50 clients, 9 VPN connections, print & file sharing and spam
filtering on top of all of the other SBS functions & we are running out
of drive space fast. We have added new drives already and at this
point it is not an option to add more drives. What I would like to do
is add a new Windows 2003 Standard Edition Server as the PDC to do AD,
DHCP, DNS, VPNs Print and File sharing and then keep the 2000 SBS
server to just handle exchange and spam filtering and disable all other
features. I do understand that the 2000 server cannot run as a BDC and
will not share the AD. What sort of problems am I going to run into by
doing this?
.
- References:
- Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- From: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- From: Charlie Russel - MVP
- Re: Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- From: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxx
- Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- Prev by Date: Re: Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- Next by Date: Re: Server a disaster .. need to manually save mailboxes
- Previous by thread: Re: Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- Next by thread: Re: Using 2000 SBS on a 2003 Standard Domain
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|