Re: exchange server
- From: "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:22:12 +1000
This basically falls into two schools of thoughts. Do you prefer the
security of your network to be under control of ISA running on SBS or some
other method. The normal alternative is some form of firewall appliance
(which could be ISA, on an appliance).
My preference is ISA on SBS, two NICs, simple NAT router.
http://www.smallbizserver.net/Default.aspx?tabid=266&articleType=ArticleView&articleId=76
WHY?
The simple NAT router provides a stable IP interface between the server and
the internet. Change ISP's or internet connection type and minimal change is
required on the server. This also avoids the use of PPPoE software on the
server for connections requiring this, the router does PPPoE.
ISA provides control and reporting of internet activity. To operate in full
'firewall mode' ISA requires two NICs.
Using SBS standard and a full featured firewall device is a valid option,
just don't confuse 'simple NAT routers' which may claim to be firewalls with
the real thing. A 'proper firewall' is a device which probably costs more
than the upgrade from SBS Standard to Premium.
"cjupiter" <cjupiter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:28C19812-EDA0-4B01-9375-81A1847AE9DA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I am relatively new to using SBS. What would be the most common network
setup for the Small Business Server 2003. And what would be recommended
for
the best security. I am setting up exchange server on SBS. Would like to
know
if it is better to use two NICs? Is it better to use an router/firewall or
software firewall? etc.
Thankyou for any help
.
- Prev by Date: Re: computer name deletion and impact
- Next by Date: RE: Share Point Timer Services (OWSTIMER.EXE) getting unknown exception
- Previous by thread: Re: exchange server
- Next by thread: Re: cannot ping local router
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
