Re: SBS 2003 secondary dc/server
- From: "kj" <kj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:45:51 -0700
I agree completely, SG.
Just pointing out that once the FSMO's have been seized, there really is
*no* safe and supported recovery option for the SBS server.
So, *Don't* do it !
--
/kj
"SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eNSfSFrtGHA.1272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
this 'throw the baby away' attitude REALLY annoys me.
In an SBS failure scenario your top priority should be RECOVERY of the
SBS, not replacement.
"inadmin" <inadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B77AD506-40D2-41F6-8847-3CA8E0FE24E3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I have an SBS 2003 box. My goal is to create a situation in which if this
server fails, another one takes its place. In order to do that, I have
added
an additional dc to the domain, and made it a GC and a DNS. My question
is,
what steps would I have to take in case the primary box fails, in the
aspect
of FSMO roles?
And what about the SBS licenses?
Thanks in advance.
.
- References:
- Re: SBS 2003 secondary dc/server
- From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]
- Re: SBS 2003 secondary dc/server
- Prev by Date: RE: Database Corruption after Exchange SP 2
- Next by Date: RE: VPN and SBS2003...
- Previous by thread: Re: SBS 2003 secondary dc/server
- Next by thread: Re: Small Business Accounting on SBS 2003 Premium - HELP PLEASE!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|