Re: SBS 2003 Server Hardware upgrade - keeping RAID 5 data drive array



Tricky. I'm going to assume for the moment that your external arrays are off
of a standalone RAID controller that will be moving to the new machine. So,
my suggestion would be to do a swing migration to the new machine. At the
point where you first boot up into Windows Server, before you do any thing
else on the new machine, you need to do some careful drive letter alignment.
If you don't, you'll have problems, I suspect. Once you have the drive
letters assigned, then you can complete the swing. Your new RAID array
should end up with the same drive assignments if at all possible - anything
else could be a problem.

Oh, and the usual caveats - backup, backup, backup. And remember what the
old and wise system administrator once said: No backup is worth a d*** until
it has been verified. And the only verification that means anything at all
is a restore.


--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64


Chuckak wrote:
Need to upgrade server hardware due to performance issues.
Have Mirrored OS (drive F: - not sure why it was built as F:) in the
server on one raid controller. All the data drives are on two more raid
controllers and in external raid arrays. I plan on moving all of these
on to the new server. The new OS mirror is larger capacity on a new
built in RAID controller and are the only new drives in the system.
Exchange and user data is also on the external drives. Should I use
backup or should I just ghost those drives also. If I use drive image or
ghost will the drive letter difference be an issue?
Not sure how to build new server, build from scratch and plug in the raid
controllers and drive arrays. Would I lose the data and have to restore
it to the arrays from ghost image or backup set? Or will the array show
on the new system?


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: AHCI Implementation
    ... Raid 0 is a stripe set, the set has to be created then win installed on it ... second array for the other two drives. ... AHCI and Vista does not have a problem with the partitions on the boot ... and wth two arrays it works just fine with NCQ turned on for both arrays. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)
  • Re: software raid: replace failing HD
    ... > wouldn't recommend you try hot swapping normal SCSI drives (50- or ... Feb 1 11:28:02 myservername kernel: md: updating md3 RAID superblock on ... Feb 1 11:28:02 myservername kernel: md3: no spare disk to reconstruct ... arrays. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Stop Error - STOP: 0x0000007b(0xF7BA5528,0xc00000034,0x00000000, 0x00000000)
    ... Seagate drives have a jumper to go between a SATA1 or a SATA2. ... The current Adaptec RAID controller is for drives of only SATA1, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded)
  • RE: New install, save data on old second hdd..??
    ... I am pretty sure the Raid arrays are ok, they are in place, and a set by the ... My concern was with XPpro... ... I "initialted" the two old single IDE drives in the ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: RAID setup
    ... redundancy raid 10 config, use the setup-install to create the OS, Exchange ... Sorry to waffle but I cant see the cost/time benefit of dual channel sata ... The RAID controller must also accomodate a split backplane. ... Larger drives have wasted unusable ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)

Loading