RE: checking and improving performance



Hi Jaffa,

Thanks for posting here.

From your post, my understanding on this issue is: the server accesses the
web link very slowly. If I am off base, please feel free to let me know.

Based on my knowledge, the Task Manager Performance tab mappings to the
following Performance Monitor Counter:

Totals:
-------------
Handles - maps to the Process Object, Handle Count counter, Instance -
Total.

Threads - maps to the Process Object, Thread Count counter, Instance -
Total

Processes - maps to System Object, Processes counter

Commit Charge (K):
-----------------------------
Total - maps to Memory Object, Committed Bytes counter

Limit - maps to Memory Object, Commit Limit counter

Peak - Is the maximum value for the Commit Charge Total during the current
session. This doesn't map to a specific performance counter.

Physical Memory (K):
-----------------------------
Total - maps to the amount of Physical memory installed on the computer.
This doesn't map directly to a specific counter in Performance monitor.

Available - Maps to Memory Object, Available KBytes counter

System Cache - This one is confusing and doesn't map to a specific
performance counter. It is not really "the SystemCache". This includes
things such as the "real" system cache, paged pool, pageable system code
and system mapped views of files.

Kernel Memory (K):
------------------------------
Total - Doesn't map to a specific performance monitor counter. It is the
sum of the Paged and Nonpaged values listed below.

Paged - maps to the Memory object, Pool paged bytes counter.

Nonpaged - maps to the Memory object, Pool Nonpaged Bytes counter

At the bottom of the Task Manager Performance tab:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Processes - same as Processes above.

CPU usage - Maps to the Processor Object, %Processor Time counter.

Mem Usage: Again doesn't map directly to a counter in perfmon. This is
closest to Process Object, Working Set Total/Physical memory + Page File.

From the above information and your description, it seems to bottlenecked
memory resources. So I suggest you add more physical memory on your server.
For more information regarding Solving performance problems, please refer
to the following knowledge article:

http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/f/?en/Library/d1fb5c74-4d58-4204
-b6e9-3ba1abfa26d91033.mspx

I hope the above information helps.

Have a nice day.

Best Regards,

Steven Zhu
MCSE
Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
PLEASE NOTE the newsgroup SECURE CODE and PASSWORD were
updated on February 14, 2006.? Please complete a re-registration process
by entering the secure code mmpng06 when prompted. Once you have
entered the secure code mmpng06, you will be able to update your profile
and access the partner newsgroups.
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
======================================================







.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Deleting a preloaded image from memory
    ... That was the declaration. ... The computer reserves a name 'aVar' for ... Store(e.g., memory, or a logical equivalent): Maps locations to values ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • Re: some questions
    ... and this is its first real job: It maps it from File Alignment ... into Memory Alignment. ... loader) and then moves the important code and data to an appropriate ... Code, proposing an Assembler, a Disassembler, and so on... ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: On finite resource usage
    ... >>> usage ... ... But most RL maps are smaller than 100x100. ... >> loaded into memory when my program is running is on the order of 20 MB. ... The major roguelikes ...
    (rec.games.roguelike.development)
  • Re: thinking of "downgrading" 76CS for 60CS
    ... >Garmin might be releasing the 60CS with more memory in the near future? ... both in auto and in the woods when hunting. ... I would have my laptop with me too. ... Though I have the topo maps, ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard
    ... Buffer overruns can still be problematic even if they only give ... > can be used to write outside the memory object that it points into. ... > have too many false positives). ...
    (sci.crypt)

Loading