Re: Adding server to SBS Exchange Org
- From: "kj" <kj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:21:55 -0700
It's not a good idea, but you've got a couple of threads on the same
subject.
--
/kj
"Andy Wolsten" <AndyWolsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C14A0C1D-EACF-4BD9-829F-0DE9710A49C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks.
So basically it is a bad idea to add a new exchange 2k3 server to the
current SBS 2003 exchange organisation for migration.
what a pain.
"kj" wrote:
Deja Vu all over again.
Inline this time
--
/kj
"Andy Wolsten" <AndyWolsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B5522ADA-B56E-4292-ABA6-B15F10298927@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
Just wondering what the potential risks are with adding a new W2K3
server
running Exchange 2003 to a current working Exchange organisation.
The principle objective is to migrate exchange. I thought about doing
this
by adding a new exchange server to the organisation, configure all the
services and migrate user data on to the new server. Finally
decomissioning
the old exchange installation
are there any problems with doing this?
Yes.
I am not sure whether the SBS
implementation of Exchange is constrained to a single exchange server
in
the
organisation.
No.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: SBS Exchange Migration
- Next by Date: Re: Remove and reinstall workstation
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding server to SBS Exchange Org
- Next by thread: Re: WM5 SSL or AES encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
