Re: Your customers and their access to the server?





In news:607d37be62d88c836729e69f840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
craig carrigan <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
Hello Lanwench [MVP - Exchange],

From a business perspective, do you think that makes sense? I'm just
curious, not saying that you are wrong. I just wonder what the
thought process would be for my customer if they asked "i need the
user/pass for the server" and we said "ok, sure, just sign this waiver
denouncing all warrantable
items ever".

Sure. I'd have no problem doing that. Even if I set up another
admin-equivalent account, as Les suggests (which I would definitely do),
auditing won't do anyone any good if someone completely hoses a box. It's
their server, it's their data, and they can fire me at any time - I will
even work with them during a handover to someone else. However, if others
beside myself have any sort of admin access to a server, I'd want it
acknowleged that Stuff Can Go Wrong and it won't be my fault, even if I'm
happy to come in and fix it after.





In news:607d37be62bb8c8366dae862735@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, craig carrigan
<craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:

Hello David,

Obviously I give it to them, it would be silly not to. I'm just
curious about any warning or assertions people give to let them know
"hey, when you mess with this server, bad things might happen, and
we aren't liable."

Create an Admin account for them. As it is there server then
legally you have too. At the end of the day if they screw it up
you charge em shed loads to fix it and give them a massive slap on
the wrist whilst saying stoopid dog.

You could ask them to sign a 'standard disclaimer' sort of thing -
"Consulting Company X shall not be liable for damage done by people
who think they know what they're doing" yaddayaddayadda. And then
give them what they want.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Activated 2003SBS asking to be activated again?
    ... > even share with me what the cause or fix were. ... > obvious traces of what he did, and he couldn't divulge the details. ... >>> I'm not saying ignorance is bliss. ... >>> able to correct it without having to rebuild the entire server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Alarming LACK of security in OS X
    ... Michelle Ronn wrote: ... So you are saying that the security in OS X is dependant on the user ... OS X Server uses Postfix for SMTP. ... so what work is being done on scanners. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Activated 2003SBS asking to be activated again?
    ... even share with me what the cause or fix were. ... obvious traces of what he did, and he couldn't divulge the details. ... >> I'm not saying ignorance is bliss. ... >> able to correct it without having to rebuild the entire server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Linux user interested in *BSD
    ... > need it if you`re setting up an OpenBSD server but for everyday use... ... I'm not saying nobody needs gnome or kde, I'm saying _I_ am happier without. ... > The basic interface drivers work and all the stuff a server needs ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: T1 T2 T3 set obsolete level estimations
    ... I've got a lvl 60 Rogue who has downed Ony about 40 times ... fairly new server. ... I'm not saying that about you, god forbid, i'm just saying that such a list says nothing _at all_ about experience and understanding for the game mechanics. ... A complete retard could get his ass dragged through all these places by 39 other people, punching his 2 keys as told by the guild leader like a monkey, end up Nr. ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)