Re: Small business thinking about backing up data, having a server and 2-3 users - is SBS2003 right for them?

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



If it were me, I'd just setup a workgroup and a inexpensive firewall
with VPN built in.
2 xp home, can they even connect to the network?
I'd use the email provided by the internet provider.
For backups if it's a small amount of data I'd even go R/W Cdrom.
I had a friend who owns a small garage, they called up a company that
wanted to do some thing similular and they bocked at the price tag.
We took a computer that was not being use loaded XP on it and created a
share.
Then added all 3 computers to the same work group and mapped the share
on each computer.
Then they just backup to Rewritable CD's rotating weekly.

I guess it depends on the budget.

Regards,
Frank









Leythos wrote:
In article <O9XH3RbYGHA.1196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank McCallister
SBS MVP" <anonymous> says...
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/105/427367

Here is what is being suggested:

So apply two factor authentication to auth against the inbound
connection before prompted for the RWW login session. That's exactly
what we do.

We use Cryptocard tokens against a Sonicwall TZ170 in front of the SBS
machine. The firewall communicates with the authentication server on the
SBS box via RADIUS, authorizing RWW, Sharepoint and TS/RDP only after
authing the incoming user. Even if the incoming machine had hostile code
capturing the credentials it is USELESS to them in a follow up session
since the OTP (one time password) is dead. They can't even touch the
Active Directory as the firewall won't let them in.

So, they use a card aginst the firewall, to auth the firewall, then a
RADIUS connection between the firewall and the domain.

So, this has little to do with RWW, it's more about the Firewall and
they crypto card.

So, RWW, as suggested, without a firewall appliance outside the domain,
to auth the first layer, is not any more secure than I suggested.

We do the same, auth the user against the firewall, using a firewall
created user/password, nothing close to their domain user/password, then
and only if they complete the auth with the firewall, they get another
chance to use PORT 3389 to attempt a RD connection to a specific machine
and only a specific machine, which is also limited in user scope to 1
user (in some cases we might allow 2 users in the case of a on-call
group).

Again, it's two layers of security in the sites posts and in mine,
that's what makes it a double auth system and more secure than exposing
RWW directly.

--

spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx
remove 999 in order to email me

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Still cant connect to RWW or OWA remotely
    ... Do you have any 3rd party Firewall software on the laptop? ... server) when you fail to access RWW with the laptop? ... selecting only OWA, RWW, and Sharepoint Web services. ... match the broadband connection, the two NIC firewall, the remote ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS 2003 R2 limited to 5 VPN connections although I have a 30
    ... I wasn't questioning the security of the connection, nor the firewall itself. ... I still strongly prefer RWW with two factor authentication. ... VPN Rule permits ONLY TCP3389 between VPN User IP and Terminal Server, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: nother IPFW question
    ... Otherwise remote sendmails using auth will stall trying ... Alternatively the firewall can ... :Sounds like someone on a remote server connected to some port on your box, ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • RE: sps03 doc lib
    ... authentication (since firewall may block windows integrated auth.). ... better to have ssl to protect your information. ...
    (microsoft.public.sharepoint.portalserver)
  • Re: XP Firewall per PGO abschalten
    ... dann diesen Suffix als DHCP Option setzt wird die ... Firewall in das Domänenprofil geschaltet und der PC ist dann evtl. ... offener konfigueriert. ... mit Auth. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.windows.server.active_directory)