Re: Not using standard SBS2003 ports - no connection??

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

i will ask the question to the guys who installed the switch.

you say the port forwarding should work? do you mean on the higher custom
port numbers?


i have tried changing my router on my system to recreate the scenario but i
cant get it to work, the only part that does is the intranet page. but when
you navigate to the RWW it fails. ie if i connect to X.X.X.X port 60000 that
goes to 80 internally on the server ip that works but when i try to goto the
RWW which is on port 60001 it cant find it and it cant connect on the ip with
port 60001 in the address bar on its own..

do you know what adsl routers i can use on the network that will allow VPN
to work, i have a Linksys router at present but i get a problem logging in
ive looked it up and its the GRE47 protocol i beleive, do you know of one
that works?

"David Elders" wrote:

Hi Dean,

Your query would probably be better directed at your Mitel
provider/installer than the SBS group. If you're running
applications/services/whatever on the Mitel switch on the ports utilised by
SBS, then its possible forwarding is going to get around this. Are the Mitel
services/whatever configurable as to what ports they use? If so, why not
change the Mitel ports?

HTH,


David




"Dean" <Dean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:25469C6B-4D5F-4D8C-8F84-EBFE65669E9B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have installed SBS2003 to standard config. We are using a mitel switch
which runs the phones and porovides access from the PC's internally to the
server.

The poblem is that i can forward the ports used by sbs for rww and vpn
etc..
because they are being used for services running on them ports for the
mitel
switch.

what i have tried is getting the switch to accept on say port 60000 and
redirect to the server ip on port 80. EXTERNAL>60000>GOES TO INTERNAL
80>SERVER

this does not work though.

the way it was done also is to redirect the ports in order:
60000 > 80
60001 >443
and so on using the port numbers suggested

Please if anyone can help it would be appreciated.


Regards

Dean Holgate
dholgate@xxxxxxx for direct answers





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cat 2924
    ... Copyright 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, ... BOX in both H/W and S/W, compared to a C2924-XL Switch... ... FastEthernet0/1 failed front-end loopback test ... to make the port configuration "visible", you need to apply 2 commands ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: Cat 2924
    ... Copyright 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, ... BOX in both H/W and S/W, compared to a C2924-XL Switch... ... FastEthernet0/1 failed front-end loopback test ... to make the port configuration "visible", you need to apply 2 commands ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Gigabit Flexibility with Magnum 6K32T Managed Switch from GarrettCom, Inc.
    ... THROUGHPUT WITH MAGNUM 6K32T MANAGED SWITCH ... Gigabit port capability to four Gb ports when compared to the ...
    (comp.dcom.lans.ethernet)
  • Gigabit Flexibility with Magnum 6K32T Managed Switch from GarrettCom, Inc.
    ... OF GB THROUGHPUT WITH MAGNUM 6K32T MANAGED SWITCH ... Gigabit port capability to four Gb ports when compared to the ...
    (sci.engr.control)
  • Re: new BSD user
    ... A long time ago (pre auto negotiate) when the very earliest ... plug the NIC of a PC up to a switch port. ... set for DHCP as the modem/router contains a built in DHCP server. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)